农药最大残留限量标准差异对我国茶叶出口RCEP成员国的贸易效率影响研究——基于随机前沿引力模型

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.03.006

茶叶科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 526-542.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.03.006

• 研究报告 • 上一篇

农药最大残留限量标准差异对我国茶叶出口RCEP成员国的贸易效率影响研究——基于随机前沿引力模型

霍增辉¹, 柳畅¹, 张玫², 陈富桥^3,*, 刘仲华^4,*

1.中国计量大学经济与管理学院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.浙江水利水电学院经济与管理学院,浙江杭州 310018;
3.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江杭州 310008;
4.湖南农业大学,湖南长沙 410128

收稿日期:2023-12-05 修回日期:2024-03-25 出版日期:2024-06-15 发布日期:2024-07-08
通讯作者: *fuqiao@126.com;larkin-liu@163.com
作者简介:霍增辉,男,教授,主要从事国际商务及应用发展经济学方面的研究。
基金资助:
中国工程院战略研究与咨询项目（2023-XY-29）、国家社会科学基金（19BGL225）、浙江省科技计划项目软科学研究项目（2024C35091）、浙江省高校基本科研业务费资助项目（2023YW79）

Study on the Impact of Standards Differences in Pesticide Maximum Residue Limits on the Trade Efficiency of RCEP Members Exporting Tea from China: Based on the Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model

HUO Zenghui¹, LIU Chang¹, ZHANG Mei², CHEN Fuqiao^3,*, LIU Zhonghua^4,*

1. College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2. College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China;
3. Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China;
4. Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

Received:2023-12-05 Revised:2024-03-25 Online:2024-06-15 Published:2024-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前,茶叶外贸面临着来自技术性贸易壁垒的挑战,以农药最大残留限量（MRLs）标准差异为切入点,构建异质性贸易指数（HIT）量化各国农药MRLs的具体差异,利用随机前沿引力模型研究农药MRLs标准差异对我国茶叶出口区域全面经济伙伴关系协定（RCEP）国家的贸易效率的影响。结果表明,中国与RCEP成员国的农药MRLs标准存在差异,但总体呈缩小的趋势。中国与RCEP成员国的农药MRLs标准的负面差异会导致中国出口茶叶的贸易效率降低;抑制作用路径表现为显著降低了茶叶出口额和出口单价。我国应进一步完善农药MRLs标准体系,使之与国际标准接轨,推动RCEP区域内国家间的标准互认,减小贸易壁垒的不利影响。

关键词: 农药最大残留限量标准差异, 茶叶贸易效率, 随机前沿引力模型, 异质性贸易指数

Abstract: Currently, tea trade is facing challenges from technical trade barriers. This study used the standards differences in pesticide maximum residue limits (MRLs) as the entry point to construct The Heterogeneity Index of Trade (HIT) to quantify the specific differences in pesticide MRLs between countries. The stochastic frontier gravity model was used to study the impact of standards differences in pesticide MRLs on the trade efficiency of RCEP members exporting tea from China. The results show that there are differences in the pesticide MRLs standards between China and RCEP members, but overall there is a decreasing trend. The negative differences in pesticide MRLs standards between China and RCEP members will lead to a reduction in the trade efficiency of China's tea exports. The inhibitory effect path is manifested by significantly reducing tea export volume and export unit price. China's pesticide MRLs standard system should be further improved to align with international standards, promote mutual recognition of standards among countries in the RCEP region, and reduce the adverse effects of trade barriers.

Key words: the standards difference in pesticide maximum residue limits (MRLs), tea trade efficiency, stochastic frontier gravity model, heterogeneity index of trade

中图分类号:

S571.1
S482

霍增辉, 柳畅, 张玫, 陈富桥, 刘仲华. 农药最大残留限量标准差异对我国茶叶出口RCEP成员国的贸易效率影响研究——基于随机前沿引力模型[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(3): 526-542. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.03.006.

HUO Zenghui, LIU Chang, ZHANG Mei, CHEN Fuqiao, LIU Zhonghua. Study on the Impact of Standards Differences in Pesticide Maximum Residue Limits on the Trade Efficiency of RCEP Members Exporting Tea from China: Based on the Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2024, 44(3): 526-542. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.03.006.

参考文献

[1] Elms D K.Getting RCEP across the line[J]. World Trade Review, 2021, 20(3): 373-380.
[2] 李峥, 刘锭, 霍增辉, 等. 中国与RCEP成员国茶叶贸易竞争性与互补性分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(5): 740-752.
Li Z, Liu D, Huo Z H, et al.Analysis on the competitiveness and complementarity of tea trade between China and RCEP members[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2022, 42(5): 740-752.
[3] 石超, 胡列曲, 段海涛. 贸易便利化对中国与RCEP其他成员国农产品贸易的影响研究[J]. 广西社会科学, 2023(5): 77-86.
Shi C, Hu L Q, Duan H T.On impact of trade facilitation on agricultural product trade between China and other RCEP member states[J]. Social Sciences in Guangxi, 2023(5): 77-86.
[4] 张少军, 余志科, 郑安然. RCEP能否抵消中美贸易战的影响: 兼论保障中国经济安全[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2023(2): 11-20.
Zhang S J, Yu Z K, Zheng A R.Can RCEP offset the impact of the China-US trade war: reconsideration of China' s economy security[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2023(2): 11-20.
[5] 张恪渝, 周玲玲. RCEP对中国经济及其区域内部地影响分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2021(11): 37-53.
Zhang K Y, Zhou L L.RCEP's impact on China's economy and regional economic structure[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2021(11): 37-53.
[6] 钱静斐, 孙致陆, 陈秧分, 等. 区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)实施对中国农业影响的量化模拟及政策启示[J]. 农业技术经济, 2022(9): 33-45.
Qian J F, Sun Z L, Chen Y F, et al.Impact of regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement on China's agriculture and policy implication[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022(9): 33-45.
[7] 葛明, 高远东. 中国对RCEP农产品出口波动因素研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2021, 36(7): 41-51.
Ge M, Gao Y D.Research on the dynamics of China's agricultural exports to RCEP countries[J]. Journal of Statistics and Information, 2021, 36(7): 41-51.
[8] 李明, 喻妍, 许月艳, 等. 中国出口RCEP成员国农产品贸易效率及潜力——基于随机前沿引力模型的分析[J]. 世界农业, 2021(8): 33-43, 68, 119.
Li M, Yu Y, Xu Y Y, et al. The efficiency and potential of China's agricultural products exports to RCEP member countries: analysis based on stochastic frontier gravity model [J]. World Agriculture, 2021(8): 33-43, 68, 119.
[9] 陈昊澜. RCEP框架下降低技术性贸易壁垒的机制分析[J]. 现代商业, 2022(6): 25-28.
Chen H L.Analysis of the mechanism for reducing technical trade barriers under the RCEP framework[J]. Modern Business, 2022(6): 25-28.
[10] Damalas C A, Eleftherohorinos I G.Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, 8(5): 1402-1419.
[11] Buah-Kwofie A, Humphries M S, Pillay L.Bioaccumulation and risk assessment of organochlorine pesticides in fish from a global biodiversity hotspot: iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 621: 273-281.
[12] 柳萍, 陶忠元, 张兴. 谈中外技术标准差异及对中国出口贸易的影响[J]. 商业时代, 2009(32): 30-31.
Liu P, Tao Z Y, Zhang X.On the differences in technical standards between China and foreign countries and their impact on China's export trade[J]. Journal of Commercial Economics, 2009(32): 30-31.
[13] Li Y, Xiong B, Beghin J C. The political economy of food standard determination: international evidence from maximum residue limits [J/OL]. Working Paper, 2014: 13011. https://works.bepress.com/john-beghin/91/.
[14] Yeung M, Kerr W A, Coomber B, et al.Declining harmonization in maximum residue levels for pesticides[J]. British Food Journal, 2018, 120(4): 901-913.
[15] 何梅珍, 温立香. RCEP成员国茶叶标准和技术法规及对贸易的影响[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2021, 34(3): 75-82.
He M Z, Wen L X.Impact of tea standards and technical regulations of RCEP member countries on trade[J]. Agricultural Research and Application, 2021, 34(3): 75-82.
[16] 秦佳琪, 王焱, 赵思源, 等. 国内外枸杞农药残留限量标准对比分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(11): 3704-3709.
Qin J Q, Wang Y, Zhao S Y, et al.Comparative analysis of domestic and foreign pesticide residue limit standards for Lycium barbarum L[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2022, 13(11): 3704-3709.
[17] 张艳梅, 李晓贝, 鄂恒超, 等. 中国食用菌出口现状及国内外食用菌中农药残留限量标准对比分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(4): 145-163.
Zhang Y M, Li X B, E H C, et al. Current status of Chinese edible fungi trade and comparative analysis of standards of edible fungi pesticide residue limits at home and abroad[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(4): 145-163.
[18] 杨丽娟, 薛伟敏, 杜为公. 国家标准对中国与“一带一路”沿线国家农产品贸易的影响研究[J]. 世界农业, 2021(11): 23-34, 118.
Yang L J, Xue W M, Du W G.Research on the effects of national standards on agricultural trade between China and countries along "the Belt and Road"[J]. World Agriculture, 2021(11): 23-34, 118.
[19] Antle J M.Benefits and costs of food safety regulation[J]. Food Policy, 1999, 24(6): 605-623.
[20] Crivelli P, Groschl J.The impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on market entry and trade flows[J]. The World Economy, 2016, 39(3): 444-473.
[21] 徐浩, 赵景峰. 新贸易保护主义对我国的影响与对策[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2022(3): 77-82.
Xu H, Zhao J F.The impacts of new protectionism on China and countermeasures[J]. Macroeconomic Management, 2022(3): 77-82.
[22] 江凌. 技术性贸易壁垒形成的政治经济学解释——基于国家间及国内利益集团间博弈的视角[J]. 生态经济, 2012(6): 56-59.
Jiang L.A political economic interpretation of the formation of the technical trade barrier: from the perspective of interactions among the inter-and intra-national interest[J]. Ecological Economy, 2012(6): 56-59.
[23] 张映红, 朱晶. 技术性贸易壁垒与中国农产品出口——基于特别贸易关注视角[J]. 世界农业, 2020(9): 4-12, 140.
Zhang Y H, Zhu J.Technical barriers to trade and China's agricultural exports: based on the perspective of specific trade concerns[J]. World Agriculture, 2020(9): 4-12, 140.
[24] Fiankor D D D, Martínez-Zarzoso I, Brümmer B. Exports and governance: the role of private voluntary agrifood standards[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2019, 50(3): 341-352.
[25] 马强, 祁春节. 农药残留限量标准对中国大陆柑橘出口贸易影响的实证分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(6): 53-58.
Ma Q, Qi C J.An empirical study on influence of maximum residue limits of pesticides on Mainland China's citrus export trade[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2013(6): 53-58.
[26] Shingal A, Ehrich M, Foletti L.Re-estimating the effect of heterogeneous standards on trade: endogeneity matters[J]. The World Economy, 2021, 44(3): 756-787.
[27] Handford C E, Elliott C T, Campbell K.A review of the global pesticide legislation and the scale of challenge in reaching the global harmonization of food safety standards[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2015, 11(4): 525-536.
[28] Otsuki T, Wilson J S, Sewadeh M.Saving two in a billion: quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports[J]. Food Policy, 2001, 26(5): 495-514.
[29] 王瑛, 许可. 食品安全标准对我国农产品出口的影响——基于引力模型的实证分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2014(10): 45-55.
Wang Y, Xu K.Influence of food safety standards on China's agricultural exports: an empirical analysis based on gravity model[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2014(10): 45-55.
[30] 顾国达, 牛晓婧, 张钱江. 技术壁垒对国际贸易影响的实证分析——以中日茶叶贸易为例[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2007(6): 74-80.
Gu G D, Niu X J, Zhang Q J.Empirical analysis of the impact of technical barriers on international trade: a case study of tea trade between China and Japan[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2007(6): 74-80.
[31] Ferro E, Otsuki T, Wilson J S.The effect of product standards on agricultural exports[J]. Food Policy, 2015, 50: 68-79.
[32] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 农药残留标准相关问题专家解读[EB/OL]. (2013-06-05)[2023-12-05]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/zwgkzt/zcjd/201306/f059b5418e3e45df8b0d74b6c53510e7.shtml.
National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China. Expert interpretation of issues related to pesticide residue standards [EB/OL]. (2013-06-05)[2023-12-05]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/zwgkzt/zcjd/201306/f059b5418e3e45df8b0d74b6c53510e7.shtml.
[33] Rau M L, Shutes K, Schlueter S. Index of heterogeneity in requirements in international agri-food trade [J/OL]. NTM Impact Working Paper, 2010. https://edepot.wur.nl/157763.
[34] Battese G E, Coelli T J.A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data[J]. Empirical Economics, 1995, 20: 325-332.
[35] 王志平, 陶长琪. 我国区域生产效率及其影响因素实证分析——基于2001—2008年省际面板数据与随机前沿方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(10): 1762-1773.
Wang Z P, Tao C Q.Regional production efficiency and its influence factors analysis in China: based on 2001—2008 inter-provincial panel-data and SFA method[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2010, 30(10): 1762-1773.
[36] 周曙东, 郑建. 中国与RCEP伙伴国的贸易效率与影响因素——基于随机前沿引力模型的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2018(7): 89-97.
Zhou S D, Zheng J.Trade efficiency between China and RCEP partners and its determinants: empirical analysis based on stochastic frontier gravity model[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2018(7): 89-97.
[37] 郭连成, 左云. 中国与欧亚经济联盟国家的贸易效率及潜力研究——基于随机前沿引力模型的分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(3): 100-110.
Guo L C, Zuo Y.Research on trading efficiency between China and countries of Eurasian Economic Union and potentials: based on stochastic frontier gravity model[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2021(3): 100-110.
[38] 刘智洋, 韩振国, 王淼. RCEP技术性贸易措施落地实施对策与建议[J]. 标准科学, 2022(10): 20-25.
Liu Z Y, Han Z G, Wang M.Implementation countermeasures and suggestions on RCEP technical trade measures[J]. Standard Science, 2022(10): 20-25.

农药最大残留限量标准差异对我国茶叶出口RCEP成员国的贸易效率影响研究——基于随机前沿引力模型

Study on the Impact of Standards Differences in Pesticide Maximum Residue Limits on the Trade Efficiency of RCEP Members Exporting Tea from China: Based on the Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	汤海昆, 张兰军, 张盼盼, 刘本英. 茶叶中生物碱类化学成分及其生物活性的研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 727-741.
[2]	李桂楠, 杨妮, 罗微, 张佳琪, 胡志航, 熊爱生, 郝建楠, 庄静. CsDET2基因的鉴定及其对茶树光周期与非生物胁迫的响应分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 742-756.
[3]	范延艮, 萧越, 孟凡月, 刘文杰, 张颖, 孙平, 张丽霞, 任丽军. 紫芽茶树品种‘紫娟'花青素合成酶基因CsANS1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 757-769.
[4]	涂一怡, 张幼, 徐婷, 陈俊杰, 王玉春, 吕务云. 基于环介导等温扩增技术检测Colletotrichum camelliae[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 770-782.
[5]	江丽, 李朵姣, 胡新荣, 沈英姿, 郑寨生, 翁晓星, 刘淑婧, 边晓东, 袁名安, 陈暄. 不同栽培模式对籽叶双收茶树新梢生理生化特性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 783-794.
[6]	王开荣, 张龙杰, 梁月荣, 黎晓湘, 郑新强. 茶树叶色鉴别、分类研究与叶色体系构建[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 795-807.
[7]	李婧, 胡新龙, 唐慧珊, 郭金灵, 胡光灿, 冯德品, 仇方方, 王明乐. 基于感官评价和代谢组学的不同嫩度宜红工夫茶品质特征分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 808-820.
[8]	郭瑜, 肖刘雨, 杜秋怡, 田野, 韩宇. 青砖茶水提多糖与茶渣碱提多糖综合提取工艺优化及乳液负载体系研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 821-840.
[9]	苏林, 黄子豪, 孙丹, 陈金华, 郑亚杰, 陆英. 基于网络药理学和斑马鱼模型研究白茶中主要化合物降血糖作用[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 841-851.
[10]	王永慧, 王多锋, 李学敏, 史田斌, 武立栋, 刘在国, 张广忠, 赵风云. 甘肃陇南和浙江金华绿茶的理化成分及体外抗氧化差异性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 852-864.
[11]	陈峻锐, 胡钧铭, 石元值, 韦翔华, 宋传奎, 张俊辉, 郑富海, 索广利. 炭基肥对茶园土壤团聚体有机碳物理稳定性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 865-878.
[12]	李兵, 朱勇, 夏程龙, 李飞龙, 蔡振洋, 吴昊. 基于改进YOLOv5s的碾茶轻量化在线分选方法[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 879-897.
[13]	孟超, 梁涛, 张霞, 王万红, 董煌林, 李明. 基于茶树种植和光伏发电的茶光互补模式研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 898-908.
[14]	周逸德, 陈家霖, 吴俊梅, 赵竑博, 孙彬妹, 刘少群, 郑鹏. 茶树氮代谢基因：环境胁迫适应机制与育种应用研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(4): 545-558.
[15]	孙梦真, 胡志航, 杨凯欣, 张佳琪, 张楠, 熊爱生, 刘慧, 庄静. 茶树生物钟CsLUX基因的鉴定及其对光合特性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(4): 559-570.