WEI Xinying, DU Yueyang, ZHOU Yide, TAN Xindong, SUN Binmei, ZHAO Hongbo, ZHENG Peng, LIU Shaoqun, MENG Hui. Advances in Prevention and Control Techniques of Tea Anthracnose[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):381-393.
KONG Weiqi, WANG Liubin, XU Huan, WANG Liyuan, WEI Kang. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Tea Plants: Mechanisms and Cultivar Screening Indicators[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):394-410.
DONG Mingjie, ZHANG Ziyou, LIN Kun, TANG Xiaoyan, GONG Fuming. Research Progress on the Microbial Fermentation γ-Aminobutyric Acid Tea[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):411-423.
CHEN Yixing, LAN Tianmeng, QIAN Kexin, GUO Mingming, LIANG Chizhou, ZHOU Li, LUO Fengjian. Transfer Behavior and Dietary Risk Assessment of Afidopyropen and Its Metabolite M440I007 in Jasmine Flowers During Cultivation, Processing and Brewing[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):424-434.
YANG Hong, SHAO Chenyu, YAO Lin, RAO Jiayi, PENG Lüwen, HUANG Feiyi, DUAN Jihua, XIE Nianci, CHEN Yuhong, LI Saijun, LIU Shuoqian, LEI Yu. Phenotypic Traits and Genome-Wide Association Study of Camellia sinensis Flowers[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):435-448.
DAI Cuiting, LEI Yu, LIU Hongyan, XIANG Fen, LI Saijun, LI Wei. The Effects of Long-Term Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer Application Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Fertility, Tea Yield, and Quality in Tea Garden[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):449-460.
LI Chunyan, LU Zheng, LUO Xuhui, ZHENG Kaibin, DONG Zhanjie, ZHANG Tao, LIU Kai, ZHONG Zhenmei. The Influence of Grass Cultivation on the Community Structure and Species Diversity of Gaocong Tea Gardens in Wuyi Mountain[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):461-474.
比较不同绿肥品种在武夷山高枞茶园的适应性,分析其对高枞茶园群落结构和物种多样性的影响,为武夷山高枞茶园可持续经营提供绿色高效技术支撑。选用7种豆科绿肥作为试验组在高枞茶园进行生草栽培,以自然生草为对照(CK),连续2年生草栽培并调查高枞茶园的物种数、重要值、生态位、群落结构和物种多样性,并采用层次分析法进行综合分析。结果表明,2023年和2024年在试验地内共发现杂草22科32属33种,主要为禾本科、菊科、蔷薇科、蓼科、叶下珠科和鸭跖草科杂草。连续生草栽培可以减少高枞茶园杂草种类,降低优势杂草的重要值和生态位宽度,改变杂草群落结构。生草栽培年限对高枞茶园物种的重要值、Patrick指数有极显著影响,对Simpson指数有显著影响;不同品种(系)绿肥之间的重要值及杂草群落特征差异极显著;种植年限与绿肥品种对群落多样性和优势度均有显著影响。层次分析结果显示,生草栽培第1年对杂草综合防控力为印度豇豆(Vigna unguiculata,MN)>猪屎豆(Crotalaria pallida,ZS)>印尼乌绿豆(Phaseolus aureus,YN)>决明003(Cassia tora No.3,YM003)>截叶铁扫帚(Lespedeza cuneata,JT)>鸡眼草(Kummerowia striata,JY)>决明007(Cassia tora No.7,YM007),生草栽培第2年对杂草综合防控力为YN>MN>ZS>YM003>JY>JT>YM007。连续生草栽培可有效降低高枞茶园杂草物种数和个体数,抑制高枞茶园杂草生长,其中MN、YN和ZS是武夷山高枞茶园较理想的绿肥品种。
HUANG Jieqiong, DENG Zhuoran, REN Hengze, LÜ Wuyun, LU Mengqian, WANG Xinchao, CHEN Yanan, WANG Yuchun. Quantitative Analysis of Tea Anthracnose Lesions Based on Deep Learning and Color-Feature Rules[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):475-488.
NIU Li, SUN Mufang, JIANG Yongwen, ZHU Hongkai. Study on the Composition and Content of Advanced Glycation End-Products in Different Teas[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):489-498.
LU Guoying, CHEN Ruonan, HUANG Xiaojing. In Vitro Study on the Inhibitory Effect of Tea Polyphenols on Dual-Species Biofilm of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):509-520.
LIU Meifeng, HUANG Ziwei, LIU Ailing, QU Zhihao, HUANG Jian'an, LIU Zhonghua, ZHANG Sheng. Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Epicatechin in Alleviating Sarcopenia in Aged Mice[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):521-534.
ZHANG Jingjing, ZHU Yuelan, WANG Chao. Molecular Mechanism of White Tea Extract Regulating EMT in Type Ⅱ Alveolar Cells via miR-146a to Inhibit Pulmonary Fibrosis in Sjögren’s Syndrome[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):535-544.
GUO Liang, CHANG Ya, KONG Yashuai, GAO Ying, LING Tiejun. Profiling of Saponins in ‘Longjing 43’ Tea Seeds by Molecular Networking[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):545-556.
YI Kaigang, YE Xiong, ZHU Yihao. A Study on the Matching Effect Between Destination Types and Advertising Appeals in Tea-Tourism Integration Destinations[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(3):557-570.
随着旅游消费的日益升级,茶旅融合目的地逐渐成为一些游客的热门选择。但当下茶旅消费仍然是小众市场,因此在有限的资源和关注下探讨茶旅融合目的地如何设计精准的营销策略显得非常必要。研究基于精细加工可能性模型与语言预期理论,探究了茶旅目的地的旅游场(氛围场 vs. 行为场)与广告诉求(感性 vs. 理性)对游客游览意愿的匹配效应及其内在机制与边界条件。通过3个实验研究发现:(1)在不同茶旅目的地旅游场类型下,广告诉求对游客游览意愿的影响具有匹配效应,即对于茶旅目的地氛围场,感性诉求比理性诉求更能唤起游客的游览意愿;(2)上述效应受到感知诊断性的中介作用,即在茶旅目的地氛围场情境下,感性诉求比理性诉求更能提高游客的感知诊断性,进而提升其游览意愿;(3)游客涉入调节了上述匹配效应和中介机制,即只有游客涉入度较高时该交互效应才存在。研究结合多理论并量化旅游场概念,丰富了茶旅目的地理论研究,为旅游目的地管理者和运营者依据目的地特点差异化定制广告营销策略等提供了实践启示。