利用16个茶叶主产省2β210份茶农调查数据,借助Logit模型分析了影响茶农绿色防控技术采用行为的因素。结果表明,茶农采用绿色防控技术受个人特征、家庭特征、茶园经营特征和组织与技术服务特征4个方面的因素影响,其中组织与技术服务特征因素的影响最大。具体来看,年龄、家庭人口规模和茶园规模对茶农采用绿色防控技术有显著的负向影响;农残限量标准认知、家庭年收入、组织化程度、技术培训和技术交流对茶农采用绿色防控技术有显著的积极影响。了解农残限量标准的茶农采用绿色防控技术的概率约是不了解的2倍;家庭收入每增加1万元,技术采用发生比相对增加2%;加入合作社的茶农采用绿色防控技术的概率是未加入的1.73倍;茶农参加病虫害防治培训次数每增加1次,技术采用发生比提升为原来的150%。受教育程度、打工收入占比、农药价格敏感性等因素在本研究中对茶农绿色防控技术采用的影响不显著。由此,有关政府部门需要通过增强茶农组织化程度,加强农户病虫害防治培训,降低技术使用成本等手段促进农户绿色防控技术的采用,以便实现绿色农业。
Abstract
Survey data were collected from 2β210 tea-growers from sixteen major tea producing provinces and then the Logit model was established to analyze the imfact factors of Green Prevention and Control Technology (GPCT) adoption by tea-growers. The results showed that GPCT adoption by tea-growers was affected by personality variables, family characteristics, operating characteristics of tea plantation, organizational and technical service characteristics. The most effective factor was organizational and technical service characteristics. Concretely, the farmer’s age, household size, cultivated area had significantly negative effects on technology adoption. The knowledge of the pesticide residues’ limitation standard (PRLS), household income, the connection with cooperation, pest control training frequency and communication with others had positive effects on technology adoption. The technology adoption rate of tea-growers who knew the PRLS was about 2 times higher than the rest. An increase of household income by ten thousand yuan could increase the technology adoption rate by 2%. Cooperative members’ technology adoption rate was 1.73 times higher than non-members. Every training of farmers could promote technology adoption rate by 1.50 times. However, the farmers’ educational status, non-agricultural income didn’t significantly affect their choices. Therefore, the related government department should improve farmers’ organization, increase training times and cut down the cost of technology adoption to promote GPCT adoption to achieve green agriculture.
关键词
茶农 /
技术采用 /
绿色防控技术 /
影响因素
Key words
green prevention and control technology /
impact factors /
technology adoption /
tea-growers
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Pimentel D, Burgess M.Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States[J]. Pesticide Problems, 2014, 3(4): 47-71.
[2] Hashemi S M, Damalas C A.Farmers′-perceptions of pesticide efficacy: Reflections on the importance of pest management practices adoption[J]. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2010, 35(1): 69-85.
[3] 周洁红. 农户蔬菜质量安全控制行为及其影响因素分析——基于浙江省396户菜农的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2006(11): 25-34.
[4] 董鸿鹏, 吕杰, 周艳波. 农户技术选择行为的影响因素分析[J]. 农业经济, 2007(8): 60-61.
[5] 马凤才, 郭翔宇. 农户技术选择的微观动机与宏观行为分析——兼论农户个体选择与村落群体选择的相容性[J]. 技术经济, 2012, 31(9): 77-81.
[6] 蔡书凯. 经济结构、耕地特征与病虫害绿色防控技术采纳的实证研究——基于安徽省740个水稻种植户的调查数据[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(4): 208-215.
[7] Feder G, Slade R.The role of public policy in the diffusion of improved agricultural technology[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1985, 67(2): 423-428.
[8] Rahman S.Farm-level pesticide use in Bangladesh determinants and awareness[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2003, 95(1): 241-252.
[9] Thrupp L A.Inappropriate incentives for pesticide use: Agricultural credit requirements in developing countries[J]. Agriculture and Human Values, 1990, 7(3): 62-69.
[10] 朱兆良, 孙波, 杨林章, 等. 我国农业面源污染的控制政策和措施[J]. 科技导报, 2005, 23(4): 47-51.
[11] 张云华, 马九杰, 孔祥智, 等. 农户采用无公害和绿色农药行为的影响因素分析——对山西、陕西和山东15县(市)的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2004(1): 41-49.
[12] 唐博文, 罗小锋, 秦军. 农户采用不同属性技术的影响因素分析——基于9省(区)2110 户农户的调查[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010(6): 49-57.
基金
中国农业科学院科技创新工程茶叶质量与风险评估创新团队(CAAS-ASTIP-2014-TRICAAS)、国家茶叶产业技术体系产业经济研究(CARS-23)