杀虫剂对茶园3种常见刺吸式口器害虫的室内毒力评价

王瑶; 慕卫; 张丽霞; 许永玉; 林琎; 张正群

PDF(780 KB)

茶叶科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 392-398.

杀虫剂对茶园3种常见刺吸式口器害虫的室内毒力评价

王瑶, 慕卫, 张丽霞, 许永玉, 林琎, 张正群^*

作者信息 +

Toxicity Assessment of Insecticides to Three Common Piercing-sucking Insects in Tea Plantations

WANG Yao, MU Wei, ZHANG Lixia, XU Yongyu, LIN Jin, ZHANG Zhengqun^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

小贯小绿叶蝉（Empoasca onukii Matsuda）、黑刺粉虱（Aleurocanthus spiniferus Quaintance）和茶蚜（Toxoptera aurantii Boyer）是茶园常见的刺吸式口器害虫,严重影响茶叶的产量和品质,化学防治是其重要的防治措施。本研究测定了10类16种杀虫剂对3种害虫若虫的室内毒力,旨在筛选出高效药剂,为其防治提供参考和依据。室内毒力测定结果显示,唑虫酰胺、甲维盐、茚虫威和虫螨腈对小贯小绿叶蝉的毒力最高,LC₅₀分别为0.23、0.52、0.94、5.24βmg·L^-1;溴氰虫酰胺、氯虫苯甲酰胺、噻虫胺和螺虫乙酯4种药剂对黑刺粉虱若虫的活性高,药后24βh的LC₅₀值分别为0.15、0.26、0.41、0.66βmg·L^-1;除了呋虫胺和茚虫威,其他14种杀虫剂均对茶蚜若虫具有较高毒力,24βh的LC₅₀值均在10βmg·L^-1以下。本研究结果对根据害虫种类有针对性地选择药剂进行防治,促进茶园农药减施有重要意义。

Abstract

Matsuda （Empoasca onukii）, Quaintance （Aleurocanthus spiniferus） and Boyer （Toxoptera aurantii） are three most common piercing-sucking insects in tea plantations, which severely reduce tea production and quality. Chemical control is one of the most important strategies in control of these tea pests. In order to screen high-efficient insecticides, the toxicities of 16 insecticides of ten different classes to the nymphs of three tea pests were evaluated under laboratory conditions. The results of toxicity tests showed that tolfenpyrad, emamectin, indoxacarb and chlorfenapyr showed the highest toxicities to the E. onukii nymphs, with the 24βh LC₅₀ values of 0.23, 0.52, 0.94βand 5.24βmg·L^-1, respectively. Cyantraniliprole, chlorantraniliprole, clothianidin and spirotetramat were four most toxic compounds for the A. spiniferus nymphs, with the 24βh LC₅₀ values of 0.15, 0.26, 0.41 and 0.66βmg·L^-1, respectively. Except for dinotefuran and indoxacarb, other fourteen tested insecticides showed high toxicities to the T. aurantii nymphs, with the 24βh LC₅₀ values below 10βmg·L^-1. The results of this study laid a foundation for selecting and applying insecticides according to the target pests, and also promoting the reduction of pesticides used in tea plantations.

导出引用

王瑶, 慕卫, 张丽霞, 许永玉, 林琎, 张正群. 杀虫剂对茶园3种常见刺吸式口器害虫的室内毒力评价[J]. 茶叶科学. 2017, 37(4): 392-398

WANG Yao, MU Wei, ZHANG Lixia, XU Yongyu, LIN Jin, ZHANG Zhengqun. Toxicity Assessment of Insecticides to Three Common Piercing-sucking Insects in Tea Plantations[J]. Journal of Tea Science. 2017, 37(4): 392-398

中图分类号： S435.711

参考文献

[1] 张汉鹄, 谭济才. 中国茶树害虫及其无公害治理[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 2004.
[2] 宋同清, 王克林, 彭晚霞, 等. 亚热带丘陵茶园间作白三叶草的生态效应[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3647-3655.
[3] 彭晚霞, 宋同清, 邹冬生, 等. 覆盖与间作对亚热带丘陵茶园生态的综合调控效果[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(8): 2370-2378.
[4] Bian L, Sun X L, Luo Z X, et al. Design and selection of trap color for capture of the tea leafhopper, Empoasca vitis, by orthogonal optimization[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2014, 151(3): 247-258.
[5] Pu X Y, Feng M G, Shi C H.Impact of three application methods on the field efficacy of a Beauveria bassiana-based mycoinsecticide against the false-eye leafhopper, Empoasca vitis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in the tea canopy[J]. Crop Protection, 2005, 24(2): 167-175.
[6] 陈李林, 林胜, 尤民生, 等. 间作牧草对茶园螨类群落多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(3): 353-362.
[7] 熊兴平. 假眼小绿叶蝉防治研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学技术, 2003(4): 1-5.
[8] 周铁锋, 杨青, 毛宇骁. 茶树害虫抗药性及抗性机制研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(36): 199-200.
[9] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 中华人民共和国农业部, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中农药最大残留限量: GB 2763—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[10] Wei Q, Yu H Y, Niu C D, et al. Comparison of insecticide susceptibilities of Empoasca vitis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from three main tea-growing regions in China[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2015, 108(3): 1251-1259.
[11] Cahill M, Jarvis W, Gorman K, et al. Resolution of baseline responses and documentation of resistance to buprofezin in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae)[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1996, 86(2): 117-122.
[12] Cui L, Qi H L, Yang D B, et al.Cycloxaprid: A novel cis-nitromethylene neonicotinoid insecticide to control imidacloprid-resistant cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii)[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2016, 132: 96-101.
[13] 唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[14] Yamaguchi K, Hikiji W, Takino M, et al.Analysis of tolfenpyrad and its metabolites in plasma in a tolfenpyrad poisoning case[J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2012, 36(7): 529-537.
[15] Leeuwen T V, Pottelberge S V, Tirry L.Biochemical analysis of a chlorfenapyr-selected resistant strain of Tetranychus urticae, Koch[J]. Pest Management Science, 2006, 62(5): 425-433.
[16] Sandra B, Sigmund S, Tore H.Sensitivity assessment of caligus rogercresseyi to emamectin benzoate in chile[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 282(1/2/3/4): 7-12.
[17] Wing K D, Sacher M, Kagaya Y, et al.Bioactivation and mode of action of the oxadiazine indoxacarb in insects[J]. Crop Protection, 2000, 19(8/9/10): 537-545.
[18] Wei Q, Mu X C, Yu H Y, et al.Susceptibility of Empoasca vitis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) populations from the main tea-growing regions of China to thirteen insecticides[J]. Crop Protection, 2017, 96: 204-210.
[19] 张传根,程武俊,李东扬. 蛇床子素对茶尺蠖和假眼小绿叶蝉的控制效果评价[J]. 农药, 2014, 53(9): 690-692.
[20] 王吉锐,穆丽霞,杜予州,等. 中国茶树的粉虱新记录——粉背刺粉虱(半翅目:粉虱科)[J]. 茶叶科学, 2016, 36(4): 427-431.
[21] Li B C, Degain B A, Harpold V S, et al. Baseline susceptibilities of B- and Q-biotype Bemisia tabaci to anthranilic diamides in Arizona[J]. Pest Management Science, 2012, 68(1): 83-91.
[22] Caballero R, Cyman S, Schuster D J.Baseline susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci, Biotype B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) to Chlorantraniliprole in Southern Florida[J]. Florida Entomologist, 2013, 96(3): 1002-1008.
[23] 戈大庆, 姜兴印, 王燕, 等. 螺虫乙酯对B型烟粉虱毒力及部分生物学参数的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2011, 38(4): 351-356.
[24] 徐德进, 季英华, 顾中言, 等. 3种杀虫剂对南京地区Q型烟粉虱的室内毒力测定[J]. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(12): 79-82.
[25] 冯淑丽, 苗培增, 贾永庆. 15%唑虫酰胺防治棉蚜的效果试验[J]. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(10): 23, 27.
[26] Shi X B, Jiang L L, Wang H Y, et al. Toxicities and sublethal effects of seven neonicotinoid insecticides on survival, growth and reproduction of imidacloprid resistant cotton aphid[J]. Pest Management Science, 2011, 67(12): 1528-1533.
[27] Frewin A J, Schaafsma A W, Hallett R H.Susceptibility of Aphelinus certus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) to neonicotinoid seed treatments used for soybean pest management[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2014, 107(4): 1450-1457.
[28] Tan K, Chen W W, Dong S H, et al. A neonicotinoid impairs olfactory learning in Asian honey bees (Apis cerana) exposed as larvae or as adults[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 10989.
[29] 张春艳, 谭济才, 谭琳. 科学使用农药, 协调茶园天敌的保护与利用[J]. 茶业通报, 2005, 27(2): 73-75.
[30] Gurusubramanian G, Rahman A, Sarmah A, et al. Pesticide usage pattern in tea ecosystem, their retrospects and alternative measures[J]. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2008, 29(6): 813-826.