管理模式对4类茶园节肢动物群落时空格局和多样性影响

潘铖, 韩善捷, 韩宝瑜

茶叶科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 316-322.

PDF(680 KB)
PDF(680 KB)
茶叶科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 316-322. DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2015.04.002

管理模式对4类茶园节肢动物群落时空格局和多样性影响

  • 潘铖1, 韩善捷1,2, 韩宝瑜1,*
作者信息 +

Effect of Various Field Management Models on Temporal and Spatial Patterns and Diversity of Arthropod Community in Four Types of Tea Plantations

  • PAN Cheng1, HAN Shanjie1,2, HAN Baoyu1,*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

选择树龄相同、品种为安吉白茶而栽培管理模式不同的有机茶园、三行密植茶园和丰产茶园,以及种植安吉白茶和龙井43等40多个品种的茶树品种园,通过在1周年内每2月1次的调查,发现:①从品种园、有机茶园、三行密植茶园至丰产茶园,天敌种数和个体数递减;三行密植茶园总个体数最大。②在垂直分层上:天敌种数和个体数在丰产茶园、三行密植茶园和品种园中皆以中层最多,在有机茶园中则以上层最多;害虫种数在丰产茶园、三行密植茶园和品种园中以中层最多,在有机茶园中以上层最多;害虫个体数在丰产茶园和三行密植茶园以下层最多,在品种园和有机茶园以中层最多;③在水平分布上,除了品种园,其他3类茶园东、西向天敌种数之和、个体数之和分别大于南、北向天敌种数之和、个体数之和;④在茶丛内、外层,4类茶园皆以内层害虫种数和个体数略多;外层天敌种数和个体数略多;⑤12月至翌年2月的越冬期间,物种数相对较少;4月、6月和10月物种数相对较多;⑥从有机茶园、品种园、丰产茶园至三行密植茶园,多样性指数递减。分析认为:尽管树龄、品种等相同,但是一个时期以来的不同管理模式可导致4类茶园节肢动物群落时空格局和多样性的显著差异,在一定程度上调控着昆虫群落结构和多样性。

Abstract

The arthropod communities were investigated by sampling at an interval of two months for one year in four types of tea plantations: organic tea plantation (OTP), tri-row dense tea tree plantation (TRDTTP), and high yield tea plantation (HYTP) Every types of tea garden planted the Anjibaicha tea cultivar with the same tea plant age, as well as the tea cultivar garden (TCG) growing with Anjibaicha, Longjin 43 and other over forty cultivars. The results showed that: ① Species richness and abundance of natural enemies decreased progressively from TCG, OTP, TRDTTP to HYTP, whilst the total abundance in TRDTTP was the highest among the four types of tea plantations. ② For the vertical stratification of arthropod communities, higher species richness and abundance of the natural enemies in HYTP, TRDTTP and TCG existed at the middle layer of tea plant than in the other layers, whereas the highest species richness and abundance occurred at the upper layer in OTP, the highest species richness of various pests occurred at the middle layer of tea plant in HYTP, TRDTTP and TCG, and at the upper layer in OTP; the highest abundance (overall individual numbers) of pests existed at the lower layer in HYTP and TRDTTP, and at the middle layer in TCG and OTP. ③ Horizontally, the sum of species richness and the sum of abundance of the natural enemies toward the eastward and the westward were more than those toward the southward and the northward in the all plantations except TCG. ④ The species richness and the abundance of pests existed in the inner layers of tea canopies were slightly higher than those in the outer layers for all four tea plantations, whilst the species richness and the abundance of the natural enemies occurred in outer layers were slightly more than those in the inner layers. ⑤ A relatively low species richness was recorded from December to February (overwinter period), while higher species richnesses were detected in April, June and October. ⑥ The diversity indices of arthropod communities decreased progressively from OTP, TCG, HYTP to TRDTTP. It is suggested that the different field management models (different types of tea plantations) might lead to the significant differences in the temporal and spatial patterns (structures) and the diversity of the arthropod communities in tea plantations.

关键词

茶园 / 节肢动物群落 / 生物多样性 / 时空格局 / 田间管理模式

Key words

arthropod community / biodiversity / field management models / temporal and spatial patterns / tea plantations

引用本文

导出引用
潘铖, 韩善捷, 韩宝瑜. 管理模式对4类茶园节肢动物群落时空格局和多样性影响[J]. 茶叶科学. 2015, 35(4): 316-322 https://doi.org/10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2015.04.002
PAN Cheng, HAN Shanjie, HAN Baoyu. Effect of Various Field Management Models on Temporal and Spatial Patterns and Diversity of Arthropod Community in Four Types of Tea Plantations[J]. Journal of Tea Science. 2015, 35(4): 316-322 https://doi.org/10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2015.04.002
中图分类号: S571.1    S435.711   

参考文献

[1] 谭济才, 邓欣, 袁哲明, 等. 南岳茶场害虫—天敌群落结构及季节动态[J]. 植物保护学报, 1997, 24(4): 341-346.
[2] 邓欣, 谭济才. 生态控制茶园内害虫、天敌种类及数量的季节变化规律[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(7): 1166-1172.
[3] 谭济才, 邓欣, 袁哲明. 不同类型茶园昆虫、蜘蛛群落结构分析[J]. 生态学报, 1998, 18(3): 289-294.
[4] 陈亦根, 熊锦君, 黄明度, 等. 茶园节肢动物类群多样性性和稳定性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(5): 875-878.
[5] 黎健龙, 唐劲驰, 赵超艺, 等. 不同景观斑块结构对茶园节肢动物多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5): 1305-1312.
[6] 韩宝瑜, 江昌俊, 李卓民. 间作密植和单行茶园节肢动物群落组成差异[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(4): 646-652.
[7] Hazarika L K, Bhuyan M, Hazarika B N.Insect pests of tea and their management[J]. Annual of Review of Entomology, 2009, 54: 267-284.
[8] Gnanapragasam N C, Sivepalan P.Eco-friendly management of tea plantations towards sustainability[J]. International Journal of Tea Science, 2004, 3(3/4): 139-146.
[9] 杨普云, 赵中华. 农作物病虫害绿色防控技术指南[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2012: 9-26, 113-123.
[10] 韩宝瑜. 茶园昆虫群落时空格局及多样性稳定性[J]. 茶叶科学, 1997, 17(1): 27-32.
[11] 苏红飞, 杨柳霞, 郑文忠, 等. 混交模式对茶园产量、天敌和主要害虫的影响研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(2): 122-128.

基金

国家自然科学基金课题(31071744)、浙江省大学生创新创业项目(2014R409056)、浙江省生物计量及检验检疫技术重点实验室开放课题(201301))

PDF(680 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉