SSR、SRAP、ISSR分子标记在茶树品种亲本鉴定上的比较分析

  • 刘振 ,
  • 赵洋 ,
  • 杨培迪 ,
  • 成杨 ,
  • 宁静 ,
  • 杨阳
展开
  • 湖南省茶叶研究所,湖南 长沙 410125
刘振(1981— ),男,陕西丹凤人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事茶树种质资源与遗传育种研究。

收稿日期: 2014-08-12

  修回日期: 2014-10-22

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-03

基金资助

项目基金:现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-23)、湖南省农业科技成果转化资金项目(2013NK4012)

Comparison of Parents Identification for Tea Variety Based on SSR, SRAP and ISSR Markers

  • LIU Zhen ,
  • ZHAO Yang ,
  • YANG Peidi ,
  • CHENG Yang ,
  • NING Jing ,
  • YANG Yang
Expand
  • Hunan Tea Research Institute, Changsha 410125, China

Received date: 2014-08-12

  Revised date: 2014-10-22

  Online published: 2019-09-03

摘要

为鉴定湘波绿2号的父本,同时为茶树亲本鉴定和亲缘关系分析等研究提供分子标记参考,本研究采用SSR、SRAP、ISSR 3种分子标记体系,在对湘波绿2号与其母本和5个可能父本进行亲缘关系分析基础上,比较了这3种分子标记体系的多态性条带比率(PPB)、多态性信息含量(PIC)、多样性指数(DI)、引物解析强度(Rp)、分子标记指数(MI)等指标。29对SSR引物共检测到等位位点83个,平均每对引物2.86个,引物PPB、PIC、DI、Rp、MI平均值分别为77.01%、0.55、0.29、1.31、0.95。17对SRAP引物共检测到等位位点139个,平均每对引物8.18个,引物PPB、PIC、DI、Rp、MI平均值分别为71.70%、0.84、0.15、3.65、3.59。10个ISSR引物共检测到等位位点90个,平均每个引物9.00个,引物PPB、PIC、DI、Rp、MI平均值分别为69.76%、0.85、0.15、4.21、4.71。3种标记体系的MI、Rp、PIC趋势一致,ISSR最高,依次为SRAP和SSR,而PPB和DI正好相反。以上结果表明,ISSR和SRAP标记具有较高的标记效率,而SSR标记具有丰富的多态性。不同分子标记体系获得的品种间相似系数有所不同,但湘波绿2号与湘波绿和福鼎大白茶聚为一类,说明湘波绿2号与其关系较近,湘波绿可能为湘波绿2号的父本。

本文引用格式

刘振 , 赵洋 , 杨培迪 , 成杨 , 宁静 , 杨阳 . SSR、SRAP、ISSR分子标记在茶树品种亲本鉴定上的比较分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014 , 34(6) : 617 -624 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.06.024

Abstract

To identify male parent of Xiangbolv 2 and to provide a reference for the choice of DNA marker in the study of relationship analysis, SSR, SRAP and ISSR were used to identify the male parent of Xiangbolv 2 among 5 possible tea varieties. Percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), diversity index (DI), resolving power (Rp), marker index (MI) and other indicators were used to compare the marker efficiencies of SSR, SRAP and ISSR. Totally 83 (2.86 per primer) alleles were identified by 29 pairs of SSR primers. The average PPB, PIC, DI, Rp, MI were 77.01%, 0.55, 0.29, 1.31, 0.95 respectively. Meanwhile, 139 (8.18 per primer) alleles were amplified by 17 pairs of SRAP, with the average PPB, PIC, DI, Rp, MI of 71.70%, 0.84, 0.15, 3.65, 3.59 respectively. 90 (9.00 per primer) alleles were detected by 10 ISSR primer, with the average PPB, PIC, DI, Rp, MI of 69.76%, 0.85, 0.15, 4.21, 4.71 respectively. MI, Rp and PIC showed the same trend among SSR, SRAP and ISSR, with the highest value of ISSR, followed by SRAP and SSR, the PPB and DI showed the opposite trend. These results indicated that ISSR and SRAP markers had high marker efficiency, and SSR markers had extensive polymorphism. Similarity coefficients among 7 accessions were different by different 3 DNA markers, but Xiangbolv 2, Xiangbolv and Fuding Dabaicha were gathered together irrespective of DNA markers, indicating that Xiangbolv might be the male parent of Xiangbolv 2.

参考文献

[1] 陈亮, 虞富莲, 杨亚军, 等. 茶树种质资源与遗传改良[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2006, 176.
[2] Harada T, Matsukawa K, Sato T, et al. DNA-RAPDs detect genetie variation and paternity in Malus[J]. Euphytiea, 1993, 65: 87-91.
[3] Pollegioni P, Woeste K, Mugnozza GS, et al. Retrospective identification of hybrid ogenic walnut plants by SSR fingerprinting and parentage analysis[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2009, 24: 321-335.
[4] 周贝贝, 马庆国, 王滑, 等. 核桃亲子鉴定方法的建立[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4258-4264.
[5] 张宇, 王长江, 唐志鹏, 等. ISSR分子标记对杧果实生苗父本的早期鉴定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(1): 7-11.
[6] 姚祝平, 叶青静, 王荣青, 等. 微卫星DNA标记在番茄亲子鉴定中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2011, 9(6): 736-743.
[7] 刘本英, 周建, 许玫, 等. 云南大理茶与福鼎大白茶种间杂交幼胚的组织培养及亲子鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(5): 735-740.
[8] 张曙光, 董丽娟, 杨阳, 等. 茶树品种“玉绿”和“玉笋”父本的EST-SSR标记鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2006, 26(6): 430-435.
[9] 刘振, 赵洋, 杨培迪, 等. 茶树SRAP反应体系优化及引物筛选[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2012, 39(4): 18-21.
[10] Zhao LP, Liu Z, Chen L, et al. Generation and characterization of polymorphic expressed sequence tag-derived polymorphic microsatellites from tea plant (Camellia sinensis) and cross-species amplification in its closely related species and varieties[J]. Conservation Genetics, 2008, 9: 1327-1331.
[11] Yang JB, Yang J, Li HT, et al. Isolation and characterization of 15 microsatellite markers from wild tea plant (Camellia taliensis) using FIASCO method[J]. Conservation genetic, 2009, 10(5): 1621-1623.
[12] 姜燕华, 段云裳, 王丽鸳, 等. 福建茶树品种的SSR分析及其人为选择的影响[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2010, (30)3: 12-16.
[13] 段云裳, 姜燕华, 王丽鸳, 等. 我国茶树主要骨干亲本及其衍生品种(系)的SSR分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报2011, 12(4): 533-538.
[14] 姚明哲, 陈亮, 王新超, 等. 我国茶树无性系品种遗传多样性和亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(4): 598-604.
[15] Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 1980, 32: 314-331.
[16] Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ.A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of pomto cultivars[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1999, 98(1): 107-112.
[17] Powell W, Morgante M.The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis[J]. Molecular Breeding, 1996, 2: 225-238.
[18] 李永祥, 李斯深, 李立会, 等. 披碱草属12个物种遗传多样性的ISSR和SSR比较分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(8): 1522-1527.
[19] Archak S, Gaikwad AB, Gautam D, et al,Karihaloo JL. Comparative assessment of DNA finger printing techniques (RAPD, ISSR and AFLP)for genetic analysis of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) accessions of India[J]. Genomics, 2003, 46(3): 362-369.
[20] 陈学军, 周坤华, 宗洪霞, 等. 中国灌木辣椒种质遗传多样性的SRAP和SSR分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 32(11): 2201-2205.
[21] 肖志娟. 不同核桃品种遗传多样性的ISSR和SSR分子标记分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
[22] 姚明哲, 陈亮, 马春雷, 等. ISSR和EST-SSR标记在检测中国、日本和肯尼亚茶树品种遗传多样性上的比较分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2009, 7(5): 897-903.
[23] 朱岩芳. 农作物品种分子标记鉴定及指纹图谱构建研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
[24] 李钰莹, 范希峰, 侯新村, 等. 利用ISSR和SSR标记分析芒荻类植物资源遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2014, 19(2): 21-27.
[25] 文雁成, 王汉中, 沈金雄, 等. SRAP和SSR标记构建的甘蓝型油菜品种指纹图谱比较[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2006, 28(3): 233-239.
[26] 祁建民, 梁景霞, 陈美霞, 等. 应用ISSR与SRAP分析烟草种质资源遗传多样性及遗传演化关系[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(8): 1425-1434.
文章导航

/