对茶产业社会责任缺失的现状、原因、治理机制与对策进行了研究。通过低水平均衡博弈模型的构建,透视了茶产业的责任缺失原因,划分了低水平均衡的三大阶段:形成阶段——量变因素的积累,加剧阶段——客观因素的催化,失衡阶段——质变因素的爆发。群体性的社会责任缺失给茶产业带来极大破坏力,需要积极打破以逐利为主要目的的“低水平均衡状态”,通过构建“全主体+全过程+全方位”的茶产业社会责任缺失治理体系,以形成“诚信、透明、公开、公平”的高水平均衡博弈,促进茶产业的健康可持续发展。
The current situation, causes, corporate governance mechanism and countermeasures of the absence of social responsibility in tea industry were discussed in this paper. By building a low level-balanced game model, this paper analyzed the reasons of irresponsibility in tea industry and divided into the following three stages of low balance: forming stage which accumulated quantitative factors, intensifying stage which catalyzed objective factors, and unbalanced stage which erupt qualitative factors. Then it pointed out that the mass irresponsibility of tea corporations brought great damage to tea industry. It needed to break the low-level equilibrium which aimed at profit, and build a social responsibility governance system of tea industry to form a high level-balanced game which was honest, clear, open and fair, and promoted the sustainable development of tea industry.
[1] 陈宗懋, 孙晓玲, 金珊. 茶叶科技创新与茶产业可持续发展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2011, 31(5): 463-472.
[2] 江用文, 陈霄雄, 朱建淼, 等. 中国茶产业2020年发展规模分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2011, 31(3): 273-282.
[3] 姜含春, 赵红鹰, 葛伟. 中国茶产业现状及发展趋势分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2009(3): 23-28.
[4] 刘晓琴. 当前中国茶产业的发展瓶颈与品牌战略规划[J]. 商业研究, 2007(3): 82-85.
[5] 冯浩文. 博弈论视点下的旁观者效应解读及其破解策略[J]. 中外企业家, 2009(1): 9-10.
[6] 吴慧珍, 周巨根. 论闽台茶产业之互动发展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2010, 30(增1): 593-598.
[7] 朱富强. 企业治理机制: 从单向治理到社会共同治理[J]. 学术月刊, 2007(12): 69-74.
[8] 沈学政, 苏祝成. 区域性公共品牌的创建及发展——以浙江茶产业为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010(36): 20985-20988.
[9] 杨珍伟, 杨亚军. “2006~2010”我国茶叶研究机构科技投入与产出效率分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2011, 31(6): 561-566.
[10] 江明生. 提升茶生产加工技术水平, 促进我国茶产业发展[J]. 农业考古, 2011(2): 247-250.
[11] 李咏涛, 刘学敏. 理顺价值链提升茶产业[J]. 中国流通经济, 2007(05): 53-56.