不仅调查了粗放和精细两种管理模式茶园内柿广翅蜡蝉越冬产卵刻痕对茶枝的为害情况,还调查统计了其越冬产卵时对茶枝直径的选择情况,以及在茶枝上越冬产卵部位、产卵刻痕长度和相应的着卵量。研究表明,两个粗放管理茶园内茶枝的受害率(9.86%、13.79%)均显著高于精细管理茶园,柿广翅蜡蝉成虫偏向于在直径为0.20~0.30βcm的茶枝上产卵越冬,而且产卵刻痕顶端至茶枝芽头的平均距离为7.22βcm,产卵刻痕长度平均值为1.35βcm。此外,柿广翅蜡蝉越冬产卵刻痕长度(x)与刻痕内着卵量(y)之间呈显著正相关关系,满足方程:y=17.83x+1.12(F=3β652,df=1β145,R2=0.96,P<2.2×10-16)。建议每年10月初到次年3月下旬,应及时剪除受越冬卵刻痕为害的茶树嫩枝条并加强茶园管理,以实现柿广翅蜡蝉越冬种群的区域性控制。本研究为信阳茶区柿广翅蜡蝉越冬种群的预测预报和生态防控提供了理论依据,对减少茶园农药用量以及提高“信阳毛尖”的产量和品质具有非常重要的意义。
In the present study, not only the scarring damage caused by overwintering eggs of Ricania sublimbata Jacobi in tea gardens with intensive or extensive management, but also the scale of tea branch chosen by R. sublimbata for oviposition, the length of scar and number of overwintering eggs in each scar were investigated. The results indicate that the damage rates in tea gardens with extensive management (9.86%, 13.79%) were significantly higher than those in intensively managed tea gardens. Adult R. sublimbata preferred to lay overwintering eggs in tea branches, with scale diameter of about 0.20-0.30βcm. Moreover, the average distance from the top of oviposition scar to tip of the tea shoot was 7.22βcm. The mean length of oviposition scar was 1.35βcm. The results also indicate that there was a significantly positive linear relationship between the length of oviposition scar (x) and number of overwintering eggs in the scar (y) and the relationship could be expressed as: y=17.83x+1.12 (F=3β652, df=1β145, R2=0.96, P<2.2×10-16). It was suggested to cut off the tea branches with oviposition scar from early October to next March, and improve management of tea garden so as to control the regional damage of this pest. This study provided a theoretical basis for the prediction and ecological control of overwintering population of R. sublimbata in Xinyang tea-producing area, which was of great significance for reducing the use of pesticides and improving yield and quality of Xinyang Maojian tea.
[1] 刘曙雯, 嵇保中, 张凯, 等. 柿广翅蜡蝉越冬卵刻痕的分布与危害特点[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(3): 57-62.
[2] 俞素琴, 徐爱珍, 汪荣灶. 柿广翅蜡蝉寄主植物的初步研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018, 24(23): 55-56.
[3] 汪荣灶, 程根明. 柿广翅蜡蝉发生规律调查[J]. 中国茶叶, 2016, 38(7): 18.
[4] 林江. 柿广翅蜡蝉生物学及其与相近种类的形态学比较研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011: 1-74.
[5] 胡梅操, 祝柳波, 袁嗣良, 等. 柿广翅蜡蝉的生物学及预测预报试行办法[J]. 江西植保, 1998, 21(1): 8-11.
[6] 汪篪, 张国宝, 刘进, 等. 柿广翅蜡蝉危害柑桔的特点与控制技术[J]. 中国南方果树, 2000, 29(3): 12.
[7] 张汉鹄. 我国茶树蜡蝉区系及其主要种类[J]. 茶叶科学, 2004, 24(4): 240-242.
[8] 周国珍, 洪海林, 饶辉福, 等. 鄂南茶树新害虫——碧蛾蜡蝉与柿广翅蜡蝉[J]. 湖北植保, 2006(4): 45.
[9] 徐德良. 茶树蜡蝉种群生态及控制技术研究[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2009: 1-39.
[10] 刘永生, 张清良. 柿广翅蜡蝉生物学特性及防治初报[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2001, 30(2): 39-41.
[11] 罗晓明, 罗天相, 刘莎. 柿广翅蜡蝉的发生与防治[J]. 河南农业科学, 2004(3): 41-42.
[12] 罗天相. 柿广翅蜡蝉发育起点温度和有效积温研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2003(15): 76-77.
[13] 夏楚贵, 钟任田, 龙士兵. 桔园柿广翅蜡蝉卵块空间分布图式[J]. 湖北农学院学报, 1991, 11(1): 29-33.
[14] 赵辉, 吴骞, 杨昊宁, 等. 信阳毛尖绿茶农业气候条件分析与区划研究[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2012, 35(4): 57-61.
[15] 赵丰华, 吕立哲, 任红楼. 信阳茶树新害虫——蜡蝉[J]. 中国茶叶, 2010, 32(10): 16-17.
[16] 赵丰华, 吕立哲, 任红楼, 等. 豫南茶园柿广翅蜡蝉生物学特性[J]. 中国茶叶, 2011, 33(5): 18-19.
[17] Hoff P D.A first course in Bayesian statistical methods[M]. New York: Springer, 2009.
[18] 陈邵彬, 储春荣, 杜庆绒. 茶树蜡蝉的发生与产卵特性[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(3): 117-120.