Welcome to Journal of Tea Science,Today is

Comparison of Growth Period and Biochemical Composition on Fujian Tea Cultivars and Genetic Diversity Analysis

  • CHEN Changsong ,
  • CHEN Zhihui ,
  • ZHONG Qiusheng ,
  • LIN Zhenghe ,
  • YOU Xiaomei ,
  • WANG Xiuping ,
  • YU Wenquan
Expand
  • Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fu’an 355015, China

Received date: 2013-05-20

  Revised date: 2013-07-19

  Online published: 2019-09-03

Abstract

The spring phenophase, biochemical composition and genetic diversity analysis of the 40 tea cultivars with same age, which passed the national and provincial examination or approval from Fujian, were surveyed and identified under the same ecological and cultural condition for two years. The results showed that among the 26 tested oolong tea cultivars, 31% of those were early sprouting cultivars, 23% were late sprouting cultivars and 46% were medium or medium-late sprouting cultivars, among the tested 14 green tea cultivars, 29% of those were extra-early sprouting cultivars, 7% were late sprouting cultivars, and the rest 64% were early or medium sprouting cultivars. Significant differences on bud stage among tea cultivars provided a strong basis for reasonable collocation on bud stage in production. In the tested cultivars, water extracts was from 40% to 52%, tea polyphenols from 9.8% to 20.8%, free amino acids from 3% to 6.8%, and caffeine from 2.9% to 5.0%. The results showed that the contents of each biochemical component among different cultivars had a relatively significant difference. The genetic diversity of tested cultivars was relatively higher, genetic distances of Zaochunhao, Zhenghe-dabaicha, Xiapu-yuanxiaocha, and Yuemingxiang were relatively farther away, and the rest 36 cultivars could be divided into 4 main groups: Tieguanyin type, Minnan type, Fuding-dabaicha type, and Huangdan type. This tudy provided important data reference and theoretical guidance for diversity of choice in production cultivars.

Cite this article

CHEN Changsong , CHEN Zhihui , ZHONG Qiusheng , LIN Zhenghe , YOU Xiaomei , WANG Xiuping , YU Wenquan . Comparison of Growth Period and Biochemical Composition on Fujian Tea Cultivars and Genetic Diversity Analysis[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2014 , 34(2) : 172 -179 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.02.012

References

[1] 尤志明, 郭吉春. 福建茶区茶树品种的搭配种植[J]. 中国茶叶, 2008, 30(11): 7-9.
[2] 余文权. 福建茶树品种发展现状与结构优化[J]. 福建茶叶, 2004(3): 36.
[3] 陈志辉, 钟秋生, 林郑和, 等. 茶树DNA的快速抽提法[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(23): 4962-4964.
[4] 姜燕华, 段云裳, 王丽鸳, 等. 福建茶树品种的SSR分析及其人为选择的影响[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2010, 33(3): 12-16.
[5] 叶乃兴, 杨如兴, 郭吉春, 等. 福建茶树遗传资源的多样性和品种创新[J]. 福建农林大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 33(2): 174-177.
[6] 邹武, 林乃铨, 王庆森. 福建主要茶树品种理化特性与假眼小绿叶蝉种群数量的相关性分析[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2006, 15(2): 129-134.
[7] 毛迎新, 邹武, 马新华, 等. 福建主要茶树品种间假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态及其抗虫性比较[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2009, 28(1): 16-19.
[8] 马新华, 邹武, 毛迎新, 等. 福建茶树害螨发生动态及其与茶树品种理化特性的相关性分析[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2007, 16(3): 196-201.
Outlines

/