Objectiveto study the differences of bioactivities of tea polyphenols (TPs) and chlorogenic acid (CHA), methods of POV assay、spectrophotometric determination and MIC were used to compare the antioxidation、scaventing free radicals and antibacterial action of TPs & CHA. Resultsin the six weeks showed that TPs (100βµg/g、200βµg/g) could restrain the POV of lard below 10βmeq/kg, antioxidation rises with concentrations of TPs, as resemble the effect of CHA (81%). On the free radicals, CHA showed selective scaventing ability, IC50(DPPH、·OH) of CHA (81%) is 65βmg/L and 135βmg/L, and CHA (20%) is 327βmg/L and 1β432βmg/L, but TPs is 52βmg/L and 1908βmg/L; In the antibacterial action, TPs and CHA can obviously inhibit both staphylococcus aureus and escherichia coli., The MIC of CHA (81%) is twice as that of CHA (20%) on staphylococcus aureus, 500βμg/g and 1β000βμg/g respectively, that of TPs is 250βμg/g, on escherichia coli.. Conclusion:TPs (95%) exceeds CHA (81%) and CHA (20%) in the antioxidation、scaventing DPPH and antibacterial activity on staphylococcus aureus, but the reverse was in the scaventing ·OH. It was regarded that TPs may play a more important role than CHA in the food and drug.
ZHANG Xing-hai
,
WANG Yue-fei
. A Comparative Study on Bioactivities of Tea Polyphenols and Chlorogenic Acid[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2007
, 27(1)
: 39
-44
.
DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2007.01.006
[1] 韩驰. 茶的抗氧化作用研究[J]. 卫生研究, 2005, 34(2): 232~234.
[2] 刘本英, 王平盛. 茶多酚生物学活性的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(12): 92~94.
[3] 胡宗福, 于文利, 赵亚平. 绿原酸清除活性氧和抗脂质过氧化的研究[J]. 食品科学, 2006, 27(2): 128~130.
[4] 赵昱, 赵军.咖啡酰奎尼酸类化合物研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2006, 31(11): 869~874.
[5] 周建军. 白藜芦醇对油脂抗氧化作用的研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2006, 32(1): 93~94.
[6] 赵保路. 茶多酚的抗氧化作用[J]. 科学通报, 2002, 47(16): 1206~1210.
[7] 蔡志强, 赵希岳. 三种天然抗氧化剂清除自由基作用的研究[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2004, 35(4): 190~192.
[8] 李会军, 李萍. 金银花类中药提取物清除自由基的作用[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2002, 33(6): 496~498.
[9] 赵保路. 氧自由基和天然抗氧化剂[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[10] 周邦靖. 常用中药的抗菌作用及其测定方法[M]. 重庆: 科学技术出版社重庆分社, 1987.
[11] 孙廷波. 金银花对口腔病原性微生物体外抑菌实验的研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 1996, 21(4): 242.