Research Paper

Study on the Differences in Ligand-binding Function and Mode of the Antennal High-abundance Odorant-binding Proteins EoblOBP9 and EoblOBP11 of the Tea Geometrid, Ectropis obliqua Prout

  • YAN Yuting ,
  • WU Fan ,
  • ZHANG Yali ,
  • FU Xiaobin ,
  • CUI Hongchun ,
  • HAN Baoyu ,
  • LI Hongliang
Expand
  • 1. College of Life Science, China Jiliang University/Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection and Quarantine, Hangzhou 310018, China;
    2. Hangzhou Tea Research Institute, China Coop., Hangzhou 310016, China;
    3. Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China

Received date: 2021-01-26

  Revised date: 2021-04-05

  Online published: 2021-10-12

Abstract

As an important lepidopteran pest in tea gardens, the male and female adults of Ectropis obliqua Prout can perceive and distinguish the chemical information of the external environment through the olfactory system, which helps its behaviors such as mating and selection of oviposition locations. In this process, Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) highly expressed in the antennae of adults may play an important role. In view of this, this study focused on the two OBPs high expressed in the antennae of the adult tea geometrid, namely EoblOBP9 and EoblOBP 11. First, it was found that both EoblOBP9 and EoblOBP11 contain six conserved cysteines, the typical characteristics of the OBPs family, while the isoelectric points are predicted to be acidic and basic, respectively, indicating their difference in the primary structural properties. Both recombinant proteins were obtained using prokaryotic expression technology, and the corresponding polyclonal antibodies were prepared by immunizing mice. It was verified that they were indeed expressed specifically in the antennae of male adults by Western blot. Their binding abilities with 20 candidate ligands were tested by fluorescence competitive binding experiments, and the results show that both of them were compatible with the two sex pheromone components (Z3,Z9-6,7-epo-18: Hy and Z3,Z6,Z9-18: Hy) and a plant volatile component (trans-2-hexenal) has a strong affinity. Meanwhile, two OBPs also showed different ligand binding spectra. For example, EoblOBP9 had a strong affinity with 1-penten-3-ol, benzyl alcohol, acetophenone and benzaldehyde, indicating that the binding profiles were wider; while EoblOBP11 had a strong affinity with α-terpineol with a more specific binding mode. Molecular docking analysis also supports this conclusion. In addition, it was predicted that the active sites of both proteins are located at the C-terminus, which also shows the commonality of ligand binding. In conclusion, this study shows that although both OBPs were specifically expressed in the adult tea geometrid with high abundance, they are both conservative and different in terms of structural properties and biochemical binding profiles. The general characters and significant differences are coexist, showing the high abundance and diversities of the OBPs. This can also explain an adaptation mechanism of the tea geometrid olfactory system in the face of the complex and changeable external environment.

Cite this article

YAN Yuting , WU Fan , ZHANG Yali , FU Xiaobin , CUI Hongchun , HAN Baoyu , LI Hongliang . Study on the Differences in Ligand-binding Function and Mode of the Antennal High-abundance Odorant-binding Proteins EoblOBP9 and EoblOBP11 of the Tea Geometrid, Ectropis obliqua Prout[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2021 , 41(5) : 643 -653 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2021.05.002

References

[1] Leal W S.Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2013, 58: 373-391.
[2] Pelosi P, Zhou J J, Ban L P, et al.Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication[J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2006, 63(14): 1658-1676.
[3] Bruce T, Wadhams L J, Woodcock C M.Insect host location: a volatile situation[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2005, 10(6): 269-274.
[4] Butenandt A, Beckmann R, Stamm D, et al.Über den sexual-lockstoff des seidenspinners Bombyx mori. Reindarstellung und Konstitution[J]. Zeitschrift für Naturforschg B, 1959, 14(4): 283-284.
[5] Symonds M, Elgar M A.The evolution of pheromone diversity[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008, 23(4): 220-228.
[6] 李喜旺, 刘丰静, 邵胜荣, 等. 茶尺蠖绿色防控技术研究现状及展望[J]. 茶叶科学, 2017, 37(4): 325-331.
Li X W, Liu F J, Shao S R, et al.Research progress and prospect of green control techniques of Ectropis obliqua[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2017, 37(4): 325-331.
[7] 高旭晖, 宛晓春, 杨云秋, 等. 茶尺蠖生物学习性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2007, 188(3): 110-113.
Gao X H, Wan X C, Yang Y Q, et al.Studies on the biological habits of Ectropis obliqua Prout[J]. Plant Protection, 2007, 188(3): 110-113.
[8] Luo Z X, Li Z Q, Cai X M, et al.Evidence of premating isolation between two sibling moths: Ectropis grisescens and Ectropis obliqua (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2017, 110(6): 2364-2370.
[9] Sun X L, Li X W, Xin Z J, et al.Development of synthetic volatile attractant for male Ectropis obliqua moths[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(7): 1532-1539.
[10] 张帅琪, 冯博文, 张婧, 等. 灰茶尺蠖和茶尺蠖绿色防控技术研究进展[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(5): 1121-1138.
Zhang S Q, Feng B W, Zhang J, et al.Research progress on green control techniques of Ectropis grisescens Warren and Ectropis obliqua Prout[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2020, 42(5): 1121-1138.
[11] Yang Y Q, Zhang L W, Guo F, et al.Reidentification of sex pheromones of tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2016, 109(1): 167-175.
[12] 江丽容, 刘守安, 韩宝瑜, 等. 7种寄主和非寄主植物气味对茶尺蠖成虫行为的调控效应[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(18): 4993-5000.
Jiang L R, Liu S A, Han B Y, et al.The adaptive strategies of insects to plant alleochemicals[J] Acta Ecologica, 2010, 30(18): 4993-5000.
[13] Sun X L, Wang G C, Gao Y, et al.Volatiles emitted from tea plants infested by Ectropis obliqua larvae are attractive to conspecific moths[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2014, 40(10): 1080-1089.
[14] Zhang Z Q, Bian L, Sun X L, et al.Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of the tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) to volatiles from a non-host plant, rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae)[J]. Pest Management Science, 2015, 71(1): 96-104.
[15] Ma L, Li Z Q, Bian L, et al.Identification and comparative study of chemosensory genes related to host selection by legs transcriptome analysis in the tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3): e0149591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149591.
[16] 赵磊, 崔宏春, 张林雅, 等. 茶尺蠖普通气味结合蛋白EoblGOBP2与茶树挥发物的结合功能研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(2): 165-171.
Zhao L, Cui H C, Zhang L Y, et al.Molecular binding characterization with tea plant volatiles of a general odorant-binding protein EoblGOBP2 in the tea geometrid, Ectropis oblique Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2014, 34(2): 165-171.
[17] Pelosi P, Iovinella I, Zhu J, et al.Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects[J]. Biological Reviews, 2017, 93(1): 184-200.
[18] 冯一璐, 傅晓斌, 吴帆, 等. 茶尺蠖信息素结合蛋白PBP2的基因克隆、原核表达及其结合功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(3): 504-512.
Feng Y L, Fu X B, Wu F, et al.Molecular cloning, prokaryotic expression and binding functions of pheromone binding protein 2 (PBP2) in the Ectropis obliqua[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(3): 504-512.
[19] Chen K, Huang M X, Shi Q C, et al.Screening of a potential leafhopper attractants and their applications in tea plantations[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B, 2019, 54(10): 1-7.
[20] 泽桑梓, 赵宁, 王大纬, 等. 反-2-己烯醛对褐梗天牛成虫引诱剂的作用效率[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2013, 32(3): 46.
Ze S Z, Zhao N, Wang D W, et al.Effect of (E)-2-hexenal on attractant efficiency of longicorn beetle[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2013, 32(3): 46.
[21] 杜家伟. 昆虫信息素及其应用[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社1988.
Du J W.Insect pheromone and its application [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1988.
[22] Maeda T, Ishiwari H.Tiadinil, a plant activator of systemic acquired resistance, boosts the production of herbivore-induced plant volatiles that attract the predatory mite Neoseiulus womersleyi in the tea plant Camellia sinensis[J]. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2012, 58(3): 247-258.
[23] 陈宗懋, 许宁, 韩宝瑜, 等. 茶树-害虫-天敌间的化学信息联系[J]. 茶叶科学, 2003, 23(s1): 38-45.
Chen Z M, Xu N, Han B Y, et al.Chemical communication between tea plant-herbivore-natural enemies[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2003, 23(s1): 38-45.
[24] Zhu J, Cossé A, Obrycki J J, et al.Olfactory reactions of the twelve-spotted lady beetle, Coleomegilla maculata and the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea to semiochemicals released from their prey and host plant: electroantennogram and behavioral responses[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999, 25(5): 1163-1177.
[25] Zheng J, Li J, Han L, et al.Crystal structure of the Locusta migratoria odorant binding protein[J]. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications, 2015, 456(3): 737-742.
[26] Liu H, Duan H, Wang Q, et al.Key amino residues determining binding activities of the odorant binding protein AlucOBP22 to two host plant terpenoids of Apolygus lucorum[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(21): 5949-5956.
[27] Wogulis M, Morgan T, Ishida Y, et al.The crystal structure of an odorant binding protein from Anopheles gambiae: Evidence for a common ligand release mechanism[J]. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications, 2006, 339(1): 157-164.
[28] Fu X B, Zhang Y L, Qiu Y L, et al.Physicochemical basis and comparison of two Type II sex pheromone components binding with pheromone-binding protein 2 from tea geometrid, Ectropis obliqua[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(50): 13084-13095.
[29] Yin J, Zhuang X, Wang Q, et al.Three amino acid residues of an odorant-binding protein are involved in binding odours in Loxostege sticticalis L[J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2015, 24(5): 528-538.
[30] Li G W, Chen X L, Li B L, et al.Binding properties of general odorant binding proteins from the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(5): e0155096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155096.
Outlines

/