Response of Phyllosphere Microorganism in Tea Plants Under Disease Infection

YE Chengcheng; WU Xiuyun; LI Zicheng; WU Suidian; JIN Shanfa; ZHU Jie

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.004

Journal of Tea Science >

2026 , Vol. 46 >Issue 2: 279 - 291

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.004

Research Paper

Response of Phyllosphere Microorganism in Tea Plants Under Disease Infection

YE Chengcheng ,
WU Xiuyun ,
LI Zicheng ,
WU Suidian ,
JIN Shanfa ,
ZHU Jie

Expand

1. Wenzhou Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer Management Station, Wenzhou 325000, China;
2. Yueqing Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Yueqing 325600, China;
3. Tea Industry Development Center of Taishun County, Taishun 325500, China;
4. Yandang Mountain Tea Plantation of Yueqing City, Yueqing 325600, China

Received date: 2025-08-07

Revised date: 2025-09-16

Online published: 2026-04-22

Fold

Abstract

Phyllosphere microorganism play a critical role in plant disease resistance, yet their response mechanisms under pathogen infection require further exploration. This study investigated the structural and functional dynamics of phyllosphere microbial communities in healthy and infected leaves of Camellia sinensis cv. ‘Zhirenzao’ to elucidate their responses to pathogen invasion and potential roles in disease defense. In this study, we collected healthy and infected leaves, and analyzed them by high-throughput gene sequencing and microbiome analysis to identify primary pathogens, delineate bacterial and fungal community structures, and predict microbial functions. The results reveal that Fusarium and Pestalotia were the dominant pathogenic genera in the infected leaves A (IA) and B (IB), respectively. Both bacterial and fungal α-diversity were significantly higher in the infected leaves compared to those of healthy leaves (P<0.05), and the β-diversity analysis also reveals significant structural differences. In terms of species composition, the healthy leaves were dominated by Proteobacteria (79.9%), while the infected leaves were mainly composed of both Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. Within the fungal communities, Dothideomycetes was a co-dominant class, while the infected leaves were dominated by Sordariomycetes, Agaricomycetes and Eurotiomycetes. LEfSe analysis further identified the significant differentiating species: the healthy leaves were dominated by potentially beneficial microbes like Trichococcus and Pseudomonas, whereas the infected leaves were primarily composed of pathogenic genera including Didymella, Plectosphaerella, Fusarium and Pestalotia. The results from functional prediction demonstrate that microbial functions in the healthy leaves were enriched for photosynthesis and carbon fixation pathways, while the infected leaves exhibited significant increase in pathways for bacterial chemotaxis, flagellar assembly and butyrate metabolism. FUNGuild annotation further reveals an increase in the proportion of plant pathogens, plant saprotrophs and wood saprotrophs in the diseased leaves, potentially reshaping the phyllosphere microbial community, where the proliferation of pathogens and decline of beneficial microbes may collectively impair host resistance. These findings provide a theoretical framework for understanding phyllosphere microbial functions in plant-pathogen interactions and establish a scientific basis for developing biocontrol strategies against tea plant diseases.

Key words： Camellia sinensis; functional prediction; high-throughput sequencing; phyllosphere microorganism

Cite this article

YE Chengcheng , WU Xiuyun , LI Zicheng , WU Suidian , JIN Shanfa , ZHU Jie . Response of Phyllosphere Microorganism in Tea Plants Under Disease Infection[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026 , 46(2) : 279 -291 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.004

References

[1] Vorholt J A.Microbial life in the phyllosphere[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2012, 10(12): 828-840.
[2] Lindow S E, Brandl M T.Microbiology of the phyllosphere[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(4): 1875-1883.
[3] Laforest-Lapointe I, Paquette A, Messier C, et al.Leaf bacterial diversity mediates plant diversity and ecosystem function relationships[J]. Nature, 2017, 546(7656): 145-147.
[4] Miller E T, Svanbäck R, Bohannan B J M. Microbiomes as metacommunities: understanding host-associated microbes through metacommunity ecology[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 33(12): 926-935.
[5] Malacrinò A.Host species identity shapes the diversity and structure of insect microbiota[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2022, 31(3): 723-735.
[6] Ritpitakphong U, Falquet L, Vimoltust A, et al.The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen[J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 210(3): 1033-1043.
[7] Berg G, Raaijmakers J M.Saving seed microbiomes[J]. The ISME Journal, 2018, 12(5): 1167-1170.
[8] 陈建英, 陈肖学, 罗旭璐, 等. 香竹箐栽培型古茶树内生真菌对植物病原菌的拮抗活性[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(3): 422-429.
Chen J Y, Chen X X, Luo X L, et al.The phytopathogenic antagonistic activity of endophytic fungi from Xiangzhuqing ancient cultivated tea[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2020, 35(3): 422-429.
[9] Xu P, Fan X Y, Mao Y X, et al.Temporal metabolite responsiveness of microbiota in the tea plant phyllosphere promotes continuous suppression of fungal pathogens[J]. Jounal of Advanced Research, 2022, 39: 49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.10.003.
[10] 郑智胜, 周艳, 黄卫红, 等. 古井老枞茶树生态系统中细菌与真菌群落多样性特征分析[J]. 微生物学报, 2024, 64(4): 1110-1126.
Zheng Z S, Zhou Y, Huang W H, et al.Bacterial and fungal diversity in the old tea plant ecosystem of Camellia sinensis ‘Fujian Shuixian’ cultivated in Gujing[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 2024, 64(4): 1110-1126.
[11] Caporaso J G, Lauber C L, Walters W A, et al.Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample[J]. PNAS, 2011, 108(s1): 4516-4522.
[12] Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, et al.ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases[J]. BMC Microbiology. 2010, 10: 189. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-189.
[13] Ruan Y, Kuzyakov Y, Liu X Y, et al.Elevated temperature and CO₂ strongly affect the growth strategies of soil bacteria[J]. Nature Communication, 2023, 14: 391. doi: s41467-023-36086-y.
[14] Callahan B J, McMurdie P J, Rosen M J, et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data[J]. Nature Methods, 2016, 13(7): 581-583.
[15] Edgar R C.UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J]. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(10): 996-998.
[16] Ren Y, Yu G, Shi C P, et al.Majorbio cloud: a one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses[J]. iMeta, 2022, 1(2): e12. doi: 10.1002/imt2.12.
[17] Wang H Q, Yuan W X, Huang W, et al.Walnut-tea intercropping model: variations in secondary metabolites and microbial interactions in tea under metabolomics perspective[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2025, 227: 120774. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120774.
[18] 姜悦, 罗继鹏, 乔亚蓓, 等. 土壤类型对超积累植物东南景天叶际微生物群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报, 2024, 50(5): 758-770.
Jiang Y, Luo J P, Qiao Y B, et al.Effects of soil types on phyllosphere microbial community structure and function of hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 2024, 50(5): 758-770.
[19] Olalde-Lira G G, et al. Characterization of Fusarium spp., a phytopathogen of avocado (Persea americana Miller var. drymifolia (Schltdl. and Cham.)) in Michoacán, México[J]. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, 2020, 52(2): 301-316.
[20] 陈义勇, 周波, 黎建龙, 等. 茶饼病病叶表面微生物多样性及病害真菌的分离鉴定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 116-123.
Chen Y Y, Zhou B, Li J L, et al.Blister blight lesions of tea (Camellia sinensis L. Kuntze) leaves: microbial diversity analysis and identification of the disease fungi[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 116-123.
[21] 姜奕冰, 宋小双, 王占斌, 等. 不同病斑等级的西伯利亚红松针叶内生真菌多样性和菌群结构[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(11): 24-33.
Jiang Y B, Song X S, Wang Z B, et al.Diversity and community structure of endophytic fungi in Pinus sibirica needles with different lesion grades[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(11): 24-33.
[22] 文文. 铁载体介导的禾谷镰刀菌和小麦穗部微生物的互作机制研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2022.
Wen W.Siderophore-mediated interaction mechanism between Fusarium graminearum and wheat panicle microbial [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2022.
[23] Zhou J M, Wang H Z, Dangl J L, et al.Fighting enemies in every which way[J]. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2025, 43(1): 307-330.
[24] Levy A, Conway J M, Dangl J L, et al.Elucidating bacterial gene functions in the plant microbiome[J]. Cell Host & Microbe, 2018, 24(4): 475-485.
[25] Bahram M, Kohout P, Anslan S, et al.Stochastic distribution of small soil eukaryotes resulting from high dispersal and drift in a local environment[J]. The ISME Journal, 2016, 10(4): 885-896.
[26] Liang Y T, Xiao X, Nuccio E E, et al.Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 22(4): 1327-1340.
[27] Xiong H C, Guo H J, Xie Y D, et al.RNAseq analysis reveals pathways and candidate genes associated with salinity tolerance in a spaceflight-induced wheat mutant[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 2017(7): 2731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03024-0.
[28] Sita K, Kumar V.Role of gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) against abiotic stress tolerance in legumes: a review[J]. Plant Physiology Reports, 2020, 25(4): 654-663.
[29] Matchado M S, Ruehlemann M, Reitmeier S, et al.On the limits of 16S rRNA gene- based metagenome prediction and functional profiling[J]. Microbial Genomics, 2024, 10(2): 001203. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001203.
[30] 杨洋. 棉花与尖孢镰刀菌互作转录组的分析及致病相关基因的挖掘[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2024.
Yang Y.Analysis of transcriptome of interaction between cotton and Fusarium oxysporum and mining of pathogenicity related genes [D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2024.
[31] Balcke G U, Bennewitz S, Bergau N, et al.Multi-omics of tomato glandular trichomes reveals distinct features of central carbon metabolism supporting high productivity of specialized metabolites[J]. Plant Cell, 2017, 29(5): 960-983.
[32] Ding K, Lü W Y, Ren H Z, et al.Small world but large diferences: cultivar-specifc secondary metabolite-mediated phyllosphere fungal homeostasis in tea plant (Camellia sinensis)[J]. Plant Soil, 2024, 2024(502): 725-743.
[33] Khanna S, Pardi D S, Kelly C R, et al.A novel microbiome therapeutic increases gut microbial diversity and prevents recurrent Clostridium diffcile infection[J]. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2016, 214(2): 173-181.
[34] 董章勇, 王振中. 植物病原真菌细胞壁降解酶的研究进展[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(21): 181-200.
Dong Z Y, Wang Z Z.Research progress of fungal cell wall-degrading enzyme[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 51(21): 181-200.
[35] 占浩鑫, 杨一帆, 宋婉婷, 等. 亚隔孢壳属Didymella真菌研究进展[J]. 菌物研究, 2024, 22(3): 207-225.
Zhan H X, Yang Y F, Song W T, et al.Advances in current research of fungi in genus Didymella[J]. Journal of Fungal Research, 2024, 22(3): 207-225.
[36] Wang X, Yin Q X, Jiang S L, et al.First report of Didymella bellidis causing tea leaf spot in China[J]. Plant Disease, 2020, 104(4): 1254-1254.
[37] Priyadarshini P, Sarojini S.Metabolite profiling and bioactivity assessment of diverse endophytic fungi from the endangered plant, Nilgirianthus ciliatus[J]. Plant Science Today, 2025,12(2): 5333. doi: 10.14719/pst.5333.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References