The amelioration effects of different biomass materials applied to three acidic tea garden soils were examined with the incubation experiments. The results indicated that the pH of three soils (LC, LG and LX) increased by 0.44, 0.31 and 0.26 units averagely while the contents of soil exchangeable acidity, exchangeable aluminum, total soluble aluminum, and total monomeric aluminum decreased significantly after biomass materials treatment for 45 days. Among different biomass materials, the amelioration effects of cow dung, straw compost and commercial organic fertilizer were more prominent than the others. The straw carbon was more effective than other materials in increasing the exchangeable cation contents and the degree of soil base saturation, as well as the soil cation exchange capacity and soil organic matter contents. These results help to better understand the mechanisms of the amelioration.
XIE Shao-hua
,
ZONG Liang-gang
,
CHU Hui
,
WANG Zhang-yi
,
QIU Xiao-lei
,
MA Ai-jun
,
HE Ren-hong
. Effects of Different Biomass Materials on the Amelioration of Acidic Tea Garden Soil[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2013
, 33(3)
: 279
-288
.
DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2013.03.009
[1] 王辉, 王宁, 徐仁扣, 等. 茶树叶和刺槐叶对茶园土壤酸度的改良效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(8): 1597-1601.
[2] 姜军, 徐仁扣, 李久玉, 等. 两种植物物料改良酸化茶园土壤的初步研究[J]. 土壤, 2007, 39(2): 322-324.
[3] 郭琳. 茶园土壤的酸化与防治[J]. 茶叶科学技术, 2008(2): 16-17.
[4] 曹丹, 张倩, 肖峻, 等. 江苏省茶园土壤酸化速率定位研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2009, 29(6): 443-448.
[5] 罗敏, 宗良纲, 陆丽君, 等. 江苏省典型茶园土壤酸化及其对策分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006, 56(2): 139-142.
[6] 陆丽君, 宗良纲, 罗敏, 等. 江苏典型茶园的茶叶氟含量及其影响因素[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(10): 2183-2185.
[7] 王宁, 李九玉, 徐仁扣. 土壤酸化及酸性土壤的改良和管理[J]. 安徽农业通报, 2007, 13(23): 48-51.
[8] Xu J M, Tang C, Chen Z L.The role of plant residues in pH change of acid soils differing in initial pH[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(4): 709-719.
[9] 袁金华, 徐仁扣. 稻壳制备的生物质炭对红壤和黄棕壤酸度的改良效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(5): 472-476.
[10] Xu R K, Coventry D R.Soil pH changes associated with lupin and wheat plant materials incorporated in a red-brown earth soil[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 250(1): 113-119.
[11] 吴志丹, 尤志明, 江福英, 等. 生物黑炭对酸化茶园土壤的改良效果[J]. 福建农业学报, 2012, 27(2): 167-172.
[12] Slattery W J, Ridley A M, Windsor S M.Ash alkalinity of animal and plant products[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1991, 31(1): 1-4.
[13] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005: 30-172.
[14] 李九玉, 徐仁扣, 季国亮. 8-羟基喹啉(pH8.3)分光光度法测定酸性土壤中的可溶性铝[J]. 土壤, 2004, 36(3): 307-309.
[15] 李建国, 章明奎, 周翠. 浙江省农业土壤酸缓冲性能的研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2005, 17(4): 207-211.
[16] 王辉, 徐仁扣, 黎星辉. 施用碱渣对茶园土壤酸度和茶叶品质的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2011, 27(1): 75-78.
[17] 阮建云, 王国庆, 石元值, 等. 茶园土壤铝动态及茶树铝吸收特性[J]. 茶叶科学, 2003, 23(增): 16-20.
[18] 于天仁. 土壤化学原理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987: 348.
[19] 王宁, 李九玉, 徐仁扣. 三种植物物料对两种茶园土壤酸度的改良效果[J]. 土壤, 2009, 41(5): 764-771.
[20] Lehmann J, Dasilva J P, Steiner C, et al. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments[J]. Plant and Soil, 2003, 249: 343-357.
[21] Topoliantz S, Ponge J F, Ballof S.Manioc peel and charcoal: A potential organic amendment for sustainable soil fertility in the tropics[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2005, 41: 15-21.
[22] 张阿凤, 潘根兴, 李恋卿. 生物黑炭及其增汇减排与改良土壤意义[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(12): 2459-2463.
[23] 张倩. 江苏省典型茶园土壤酸化动态及调控措施研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011: 48.
[24] Rebecca R.Rethinking Biochar[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(17): 5932-5933.
[25] Christoph S, Bruno G, Wenceslau G T, et al. Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central amazonian ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2008, 171(6): 893-899.
[26] 鲁彩艳, 陈欣. 有机碳源对不同C/N比有机物料氮矿化进程的影响[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 2004, 21(1): 108-112.
[27] 张爱民, 尹冰. 秸秆发酵制沼气研究现状[J]. 农业工程技术: 新能源产业, 2009(9): 18-20.
[28] Tate R L.Soil Microbiology[M]. Wiley: New York, 1995: 398.
[29] Jiu-Yu LI, Ren-kou XU, Guo-liang JI. Dissolution of aluminum in variably charged soils as affected by low-molecular-weight organic acids[J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(4): 484-490.
[30] 王宁, 徐仁扣, 李九玉. 添加植物物料对2种酸性土壤可溶性铝的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2009, 25(3): 59-68.