欢迎访问《茶叶科学》,今天是

分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定不同茶类中2,4-表芸苔素内酯残留

  • 诸力 ,
  • 陈红平 ,
  • 柴云峰 ,
  • 马桂岑 ,
  • 郝振霞 ,
  • 王晨 ,
  • 刘新 ,
  • 鲁成银
展开
  • 农业农村部茶叶质量监督检验测试中心,中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,农业农村部茶叶产品质量安全风险评估实验室(杭州),农业部茶叶质量安全控制重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310008
诸力,男,助理研究员,主要从事茶叶质量安全与风险评估研究。

收稿日期: 2018-04-28

  修回日期: 2018-08-03

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-15

基金资助

国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-19)、国家自然科学基金(No. 31671941)、中国农业科学院创新团队茶叶质量与风险评估团队(CAAS-ASTIP-2014-TRICAAS-06)

Determination of 2,4-Epibrassinolide in Different Teas by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction

  • ZHU Li ,
  • CHEN Hongping ,
  • CHAI Yunfeng ,
  • MA Guicen ,
  • HAO Zhenxia ,
  • WANG Chen ,
  • LIU Xin ,
  • LU Chengyin
Expand
  • Tea Quality and Supervision Testing Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Tea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Hangzhou), Key Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310008, China

Received date: 2018-04-28

  Revised date: 2018-08-03

  Online published: 2019-12-15

摘要

建立了一种分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱快速测定不同茶类中2,4-表芸苔素内酯的方法。样品经乙腈均质提取,通过C18、强阴离子交换剂(SAX)和石墨化碳黑(GCB)混合吸附剂分散萃取前处理,以HSS T3色谱柱分离,采用ESI正离子扫描和可编程多反应监测模式(SMRM)检测,基质匹配溶液外标法定量。2,4-表芸苔素内酯在0.8~800βμg·L-1范围内线性良好(R2>0.999)。在不同茶类(绿茶、红茶、白茶、黑茶、乌龙茶)中标准样含量20、40和200βμg·kg-1添加水平下,目标化合物回收率均介于75.5%~93.6%之间,相对标准偏差RSD值在0.4%~7.0%之间(n=6),方法定量限(LOQ,S/N=10)在0.55~1.46βμg·kg-1之间。该方法稳定、准确、灵敏,能够满足各茶类检测需求。

本文引用格式

诸力 , 陈红平 , 柴云峰 , 马桂岑 , 郝振霞 , 王晨 , 刘新 , 鲁成银 . 分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定不同茶类中2,4-表芸苔素内酯残留[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018 , 38(6) : 589 -594 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2018.06.005

Abstract

An efficient method for analyzing 2,4-Epibrassinolide in different teas was developed based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Homogenized samples were extracted with acetonitrile solution, cleaned up with three sorbents including C18, strong anion exchanger (SAX) and graphitized carbon black (GCB). The compound was separated on a HSS T3 column using electrospray Ionization (ESI) mode, detected by scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (SMRM) and quantified by matrix-matched external standard curves. The compound showed good linearity between the concentration of 0.8-800βμg·L-1, with high significant correlation (R2>0.999). The limit of quantitation (LOQ, S/N=10) ranged from 0.55 to 1.46βμg·kg-1. In addition, the spiked (20, 40, 200βμg·kg-1) recoveries of tea samples were 75.5%-93.6%, and RSDs were 0.4%-7.0%. The method was accurately and sensitively applied to commercial tea samples, which fulfilled all requirement for the determination of 2,4-Epibrassinolide in tea samples.

参考文献

[1] Grove M D, Spencer G F, Rohwedder W K, et al.A unique plant growth promoting steroid from Brassica napus pollen[J]. Nature, 1979, 281: 216-217.
[2] 王广聚, 董服灿, 董建军. 24-表油菜素内酯的合成及应用研究[J].Pesticides, 2001, 40(6) : 12-15.
[3] 朱永兴. 茶树生长调节剂的研究与应用[J]. 中国茶叶, 1998, 20(2) : 12-13.
[4] 陆剑飞. 四种植物生长调节剂对茶叶产量与品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2006, 18(3) : 192-194.
[5] Lee K J, Johnson V, Blakley B.The effect of exposure to a commercial 2,4-D formulation during gestation on the immune response in CD-1 mice[J]. Toxicology, 2001, 165(1) : 39-49.
[6] Erin N, Afacan B, Ersoy Y.Gibberellic acid, a plant growth regulator, increases mast cell recruitment and alters Substance P levels[J]. Toxicology, 2008, 254(1/2) : 75-81.
[7] Tuluce Y, Celik I.Effects of indole-3-acetic acid and kinetin on the adenosine deaminase activity in various tissues of rats[J]. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2006, 18(1) : 528-532.
[8] Cao L D, Yang J, Li X H, et al.Determination of brassinolide analogs by high-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection[J]. Analytical Letters, 2015, 48(4): 575-585.
[9] Lv T, Zhao X E, Zhu S Y.et al.Development of an efficient hplc fluorescence detection method for brassinolide by ultrasonic-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with derivatization[J]. Chromatographia, 2014, 77(23/24): 1653-1660.
[10] Oklestkova J, Tarkowska D, Eyer L, et al.Immunoaffinity chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry: A new tool for the selective capture and analysis of brassinosteroid plant hormones[J]. Talanta, 2017, 170: 432-440.
[11] Ding J, Mao L J, Wang S T, et al.Determination of endogenous brassinosteroids in plant tissues using solid-phase extraction with double layered cartridge followed by high-performance liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Phytochemical Analysis, 2013, 24(4): 386-394.
[12] Huo F F, Wang X, Han Y H, et al.A new derivatization approach for the rapid and sensitive analysis of brassinosteroids by using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry[J]. Talanta, 2012, 99: 420-425.
[13] Jiao W T, Xiao Y, Qian X S, et al.Optimized combination of dilution and refined QuEChERS to overcome matrix effects of six types of tea for determination eight neonicotinoid insecticides by ultra performance liquid chromatography- electrospray tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 210: 26-34.
[14] Rahman M M, Abd El-Aty A M, Choi J H, et al. Consequences of the matrix effect on recovery of dinotefuran and its metabolites in green tea during tandem mass spectrometry analysis[J]. Food Chemistry, 2015, 168: 445-453.
[15] Zhang K, Wong J W, Yang P, et al.Protocol for an electrospray ionization tandem mass spectral product ion library: development and application for identification of 240 pesticides in foods[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2012, 84(13): 5677-5684.
[16] 诸力, 王晨, 陈红平, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定茶叶中11种植物生长调节剂及吡虫啉、啶虫脒的残留[J]. 分析化学, 2017, 45(4): 529-536.
[17] 虞冰, 刘莉, 汪志威, 等. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法快速测定草莓中2,4-表芸苔素内酯残留量[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(9): 1538-1540, 1545.
[18] Kittlaus S, Schimanke J, Kempe G, et al.Assessment of sample cleanup and matrix effects in the pesticide residue analysis of foods using postcolumn infusion in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2011, 1218(46): 8399-8410.
文章导航

/