欢迎访问《茶叶科学》,今天是

中日绿茶贸易中的技术性贸易壁垒度量

  • 江涛 ,
  • 覃琼霞
展开
  • 1. 浙江大学经济学院,中国计量学院经济与管理学院,浙江 杭州310018;
    2. 浙江水利水电专科学校,浙江大学管理学院,浙江 杭州310058
江涛(1977— ),男,浙江嘉善人,讲师、博士生,主要研究方向为国际贸易。jtqqx@yahoo.com.cn

收稿日期: 2010-02-03

  修回日期: 2010-05-28

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-11

基金资助

浙江省社科联重点研究课题(08Z28),教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目青年基金(09YJC790249),浙江省高校人文社科重点研究基地─标准化与知识产权管理自主立项课题

The Measurement on TBT of the Sino-Japan Green Tea Trade

  • JIANG Tao ,
  • QIN Qiong-xia
Expand
  • 1. Zhengjiang University, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
    2. Zhejiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower College, Management Science College, Zhengjiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received date: 2010-02-03

  Revised date: 2010-05-28

  Online published: 2019-09-11

摘要

通过基于楔子模型的关税等价方法度量中日绿茶贸易中技术性贸易壁垒。首先从个体决策优化开始,采用家庭效用函数测算日本消费者对不同产地绿茶的消费偏好,再运用中日绿茶贸易和日本国内市场月度统计数据测算中日绿茶贸易中的技术性贸易壁垒。

本文引用格式

江涛 , 覃琼霞 . 中日绿茶贸易中的技术性贸易壁垒度量[J]. 茶叶科学, 2010 , 30(4) : 322 -327 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2010.04.015

Abstract

The value of Technology Trade Barrier(TBT) in Sino-Japan green tea trade was gauged by the method of tariff-equivalent and wedge model. Based on the individual decision, The family utility function was used to estimate the Japanese consumer preference of different green tea. And then by the data on Sino-Japan green tea trade and Japan domestic month statistics, the value of the corresponding trade tariffs equivalence was gotten.

参考文献

[1] Cato J C, C A Lima dos Santos. European Union 1997 Seafood Safety Ban: The Economic Consequences on Bangladesh Shrimp Processing[J]. Marine Resources Economics, 1998, 13(3): 215-27.
[2] Otsuki T, J S Wilson, M Sewadeh. Saving Two in a Billion: A Case Study to Quantify the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards in African Exports[R]. Washington, D C: Working paper, The World Bank 2000.
[3] 许咏梅, 苏祝成. 中国茶叶在日本市场的价格竞争力研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2007(5): 55-59.
[4] Calvin L, B Krissoff. Technical Barriers to Trade: A Case Study of Phytosanitary Barriers and US Japanese Apple Trade[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1998, 23(2): 351-366.
[5] Beghin J C, J C Bureau. Quantitative Policy Analysis of Sanitary, Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade[J]. Économie Internationale, 2001(3): 107-130.
[6] 张海东. SPS壁垒及其经济效应度量研究新进展[J]. 管理世界, 2008(2): 163-168.
[7] Yue C, J Beghin, H H Jensen. Tariff Equivalent of Technical Barriers to Trade with Imperfect Substitution and Trade Costs[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2006, 88(4): 947-960.
[8] 周华, 王卉, 严科杰. 标准对贸易及福利影响的实证检验——基于价格楔方法以欧盟RoHS指令对上海市机电产业的影响为例[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2007(8): 100-108.
[9] Bigsby H R, C F Whyte. Quantifying Phytosanitary Barriers to Trade[C]// N Hooker, E Murano. Interdisciplinary Food Safety Research. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000.
[10] Gasiorek M, A Smith, A J Venables. Trade and Welfare: A General Equilibrium Model[C]// L A Winters. Trade Flows and Trade Policy After “1992”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[11] Harrison G, T F Rutherford, D G Tarr. Increased Competition and Completion of the Market in the European Union: Static and Steady State Effects[J]. Journal of Economic Integration, 1996(11): 332-365.
[12] Anne-Celia Disdier, Lionel Fontagne, Mondher Mimouni.The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from SPS and TBT Agreements[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008, 90(2): 336-350.
[13] 顾国达, 牛晓婧, 张钱江. 技术壁垒对国际贸易影响的实证分析——以中日茶叶贸易为例[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2007(6): 74-80.
[14] Swann P, P Temple, M Shurmer. Standards and Trade Performance: The UK Experience[J]. Economic Journal, 1996, 106(7): 1297-1313.
[15] 鲍晓华, 朱钟棣. 技术性贸易壁垒的测量及其对中国进口贸易的影响[J]. 世界经济, 2006(7): 3-14.
文章导航

/