欢迎访问《茶叶科学》,今天是

优质绿茶加工过程主要物理特性变化的研究

  • 李琛 ,
  • 艾仄宜 ,
  • 余志 ,
  • 陈玉琼 ,
  • 倪德江
展开
  • 1. 华中农业大学园艺林学学院/园艺植物生物学教育部重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430070;
    2. 江西省蚕桑茶叶研究所,江西 南昌 330203
李琛,女,助理研究员,主要从事茶叶加工方面的研究,hanwuji1110@126.com。

收稿日期: 2019-01-24

  修回日期: 2019-02-27

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-24

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0700505)

Research on Main Physical Properties of Tea Leaves in High-quality Green Tea Processing

  • LI Chen ,
  • AI Zeyi ,
  • YU Zhi ,
  • CHEN Yuqiong ,
  • NI Dejiang
Expand
  • 1. College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2. Jiangxi Sericulture And Tea Research Institute, Nanchang 330203, China

Received date: 2019-01-24

  Revised date: 2019-02-27

  Online published: 2019-12-24

摘要

以茶树单芽和一芽一叶为试验材料,采用恒重法、量筒法、TPA测试和应力应变拉伸测试,研究针形名优绿茶加工过程物料容重、质构特性和拉伸等物理特性的变化规律。结果表明,在针形绿茶加工过程中,茶叶容重呈先增后减的趋势,峰值出现在揉捻叶(含水量56%~58%),做形后期、固形和干燥过程茶叶容重急剧下降。塑性也呈现先增后降的趋势,在揉捻工序达到最大值,其后在做形过程(含水量58%~23%)均维持在较高水平,而在固形和干燥阶段显著下降。弹性的变化趋势与塑性相反,呈先下降再升高的趋势,在揉捻及做形过程(含水量58%~23%)处于最低水平。加工过程柔软性的变化幅度较小。茶叶的拉伸过程经历线性阶段、非线性阶段和塑性变形到断裂阶段。随着加工的进程,最大力呈先下降后升高(含水率56%~57%)的趋势,拉伸强度则呈增加趋势,弹性模量在揉捻前变化小(含水率56%~57%),但此后显著增加。相关性分析表明,加工过程茶叶的拉伸强度与含水率呈极显著的负相关。研究结果还表明,单芽和一芽一叶的主要物理特性在加工过程的变化不尽相同。除柔软性接近外,单芽原料的容重、弹性、最大力要高于一芽一叶,但塑性、拉伸强度、弹性模量要小于一芽一叶。除了塑性和柔软性接近外,单芽在各工序的容重和弹性均高于一芽一叶,但一芽一叶的弹性模量和拉伸强度在全过程均高于单芽,最大力在揉捻后显著高于单芽。说明在机械设计原理和加工工艺的掌握方面需要注意原料的差异性。

本文引用格式

李琛 , 艾仄宜 , 余志 , 陈玉琼 , 倪德江 . 优质绿茶加工过程主要物理特性变化的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019 , 39(6) : 705 -714 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2019.06.009

Abstract

Taking one bud and one bud with one leaf of tea as the test materials, the variations of physical properties of tea leaves such as bulk density, texture and tensile properties in needle-shaped green tea processing were studied by the method of constant weight and graduated cylinder, TPA and stress-strain tensile test. As a result, the bulk density of tea leaves was first increased and then decreased, with the peak in the rolled leaves (water content 56%-58%). it was sharply decreased during the post-forming, fixing and drying processes. The plasticity presented the same trend with the maximum appeared in the rolling process. It then remained a high level in the forming process (water content 58%-23%), and declined significantly during the fixing and drying processes. The trend of elasticity was opposite to the plasticity, with the lowest level in the rolling and forming processes (water content 58%-23%). Less variation was observed in flexibility during the whole processing. The tensile process of tea leaves undergoed linear, nonlinear and plastic deformation to fracture stages. The trend of maximum force was decreased first and then increased (water content 56%-57%). The tensile strength was increased during the whole processing. The elastic modulus varied a little before the rolling process and then increased significantly. The correlation analysis shows that the tensile strength of tea leaves was significantly and negatively correlated with water content in the processing, and the diversification of main physical properties of one bud and one bud with one leaf in processing were not exactly the same. Besides the similar level of plasticity and flexibility, the bulk density, elasticity and maximum force of one bud were higher than that of one bud with one leaf. While the plasticity, tensile strength and elastic modulus showed an opposite trend. In the whole processing, apart from the similar level of plasticity and flexibility, the bulk density and elasticity of one bud in each process were higher than that of one bud with one leaf, but the elastic modulus and tensile strength showed an opposite trend. the maximum force of one bud with one leaf was significantly higher than that of one bud after the rolling process. In conclusion, the differences in raw materials should be emphasized in the principles of mechanical design and processing techniques.

参考文献

[1] 赵多佳, 郭维俊, 宋言明, 等. 小麦茎秆抗拉性能研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(14): 5837-5838, 5841.
[2] 罗龙新. 鲜叶物理特性与成条关系的初步探讨[J]. 中国茶叶, 1984(4): 9-11.
[3] 林燕萍, 金心怡, 郝志龙, 等. 茶树嫩梢力学特性与粗纤维试验[J]. 茶叶科学, 2013, 33(4): 364-369.
[4] 曹望成, 薛运风, 周巨根. 茶树新梢剪切力学特性的研究[J]. 浙江农业大学学报, 1995, 21(1): 11-16.
[5] 潘周光. 茶叶梗茎剪切特性与嫩度关系的试验研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2008, 28(6): 425-428.
[6] 王秀萍, 陈常颂. 茶叶力、热特性研究及其在制茶工程中的应用[J]. 茶叶科学技术, 2001(4): 15-17.
[7] 张哲, 牛智有. 茶叶加工过程中的物理特性变化规律[J]. 农机化研究, 2012, 34(8): 116-123, 123.
[8] 黄伙水, 马艳凌, 贾献涛. 闽南乌龙茶成型机理的试验初探[J]. 福建茶叶试验研究, 2009, 31(4): 8-13.
[9] 林燕萍. 乌龙茶包揉叶力学特性及其影响因素试验研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2011.
[10] 龚琦, 钱惠萍. LRC数字电桥检测茶叶品质的研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 1997, 13(2): 216-219.
[11] 赵瑶, 封雯, 贺勇, 等. 针形名优绿茶固形机的研制与固形工艺优化[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2014, 33(2): 116-122.
[12] 刘伟. 包揉与压揉工艺对闽南乌龙茶造型与品质的影响研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2013.
[13] 张哲, 牛智有. 揉捻过程中茶叶物理特性的变化规律[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51: 2767-2770.
[14] 赵瑶, 倪德江. 针形名优绿茶做形工艺研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 中国茶叶加工, 2009(4): 28-30.
[15] 倪德江, 郑亚楠, 赵瑶. 名优茶加工固形理论的研究与应用[J]. 中国茶叶, 2010(3): 16-17.
[16] 陈争光, 王德福, 李利桥, 等. 玉米秸秆皮拉伸和剪切特性试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(21): 59-65.
[17] Khan M M R, Chen Y, Belsham T, et al. Fineness and tensile properties of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) fibres[J]. Biosystem Engineering, 2011, 108(1): 9-17.
[18] 向波, 刘丕庆, 孙仙奇, 等. 水稻茎秆节间弹性模量和拉伸强度极限的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(18): 5388-5389, 5478.
文章导航

/