小贯小绿叶蝉在5个茶树品种（系）上的蜜露排泄量与茶树叶片结构比较

刘丰静; 冉伟; 李喜旺; 汪素琴; 孙晓玲

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.008

茶叶科学 >

2020 , Vol. 40 >Issue 5: 625 - 631

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.008

研究报告

小贯小绿叶蝉在5个茶树品种（系）上的蜜露排泄量与茶树叶片结构比较

刘丰静 ,
冉伟 ,
李喜旺 ,
汪素琴 ,
孙晓玲

展开

1.福建省农业科学院茶叶研究所,福建福州 350013;
2.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江杭州 310008;
3.农业部茶树生物学与资源利用重点实验室,浙江杭州 310008;
4.绍兴市经济作物技术推广中心,浙江绍兴 312000

刘丰静，男，助理研究员，主要从事茶树害虫防控研究。

收稿日期: 2020-07-23

修回日期: 2020-08-24

网络出版日期: 2020-10-10

基金资助

国家茶叶产业技术体系咀嚼式害虫防控（CARS-19）

收起

The Comparison of Leaf Structures and Empoasca Onukii Matsuda Honeydew Excretion among Five Tea Cultivars (Strains)

LIU Fengjing ,
RAN Wei ,
LI Xiwang ,
WANG Suqin ,
SUN Xiaoling

Expand

1. Tea Research Institute of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China;
2. Institute of Tea Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China;
4. Shaoxing Economic crop Technology Extension Center, Shaoxing 312000, China

Received date: 2020-07-23

Revised date: 2020-08-24

Online published: 2020-10-10

Fold

摘要

为明确茶树叶片组织结构与小贯小绿叶蝉抗性之间的相关性,在确定小贯小绿叶蝉不同龄期和虫态蜜露排泄量的基础上,比较研究了小贯小绿叶蝉雌成虫在不同茶树品种（系）上取食24 h后蜜露排泄量的差异,进而通过比较不同茶树品种（系）叶片的组织结构和色泽,分析了5个茶树品种（系）叶片的组织结构与茶树对小贯小绿叶蝉抗性能力强弱的关系。研究结果表明,小贯小绿叶蝉4龄若虫的蜜露排泄量显著高于1~3龄;雌、雄成虫的蜜露排泄量之间不具显著差异;取食中选10号的雌成虫蜜露排泄量显著低于取食其他品种;不同品种（系）茶树的叶面积、叶片总厚度、上表皮厚度、下表皮厚度以及色差等指标与雌成虫的蜜露排泄量之间无显著相关性,而叶片茸毛密度与雌成虫蜜露排泄量呈显著负相关,叶片茸毛长度与蜜露排泄量呈显著正相关。

关键词： 小贯小绿叶蝉; 茶树品种（系）; 蜜露排泄量; 叶片结构

本文引用格式

刘丰静 , 冉伟 , 李喜旺 , 汪素琴 , 孙晓玲 . 小贯小绿叶蝉在5个茶树品种（系）上的蜜露排泄量与茶树叶片结构比较[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020 , 40(5) : 625 -631 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.008

Abstract

The food consumptions of Empoasca onukii female adults feeding on the leaves of five tea cultivars (strains) were compared by weighing the honeydew excretion after 24 h. The leaf structures and colors of five tea cultivars (strains) were also compared. Further analysis illustrated the relationship between plant resistance to E.onukii and leaf structures. The results show that: (1) the food consumption of female adults feeding on cv. Zhongxuan 10 was significantly lower than those feeding on other cultivars (strains), and there was no significant difference between the male and female adults. (2) The leaf area, blade thickness, upper skin thickness, lower skin thickness and chromatic aberration of different tea cultivars (strains) had little effect on E. onukii’s honeydew excretion. The density of leaf pubescence was negatively correlated to the honeydew excretion, but the length of leaf pubescence had a positive correlation with the honeydew excretion.

Key words： Empoasca onukii Matsuda; tea cultivars (strains); honeydew excretion; leaf structure

参考文献

[1] 吕文明, 陈琇, 罗其忍. 小绿叶蝉发生规律及其防治研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 1964, 1(1): 45-55.
Lyu W M, Chen X, Luo Q R.Research on ocurence and control of Empoasca flavescens[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 1964, 1(1): 45-55.
[2] 葛钟麟, 张汉鹄. 中国茶叶蝉种类研究(一)[J]. 茶业通报, 1988(1): 15-18.
Ge Z L, Zhang H G.Research on the Cicadelidae species damaging Chinese tea shrub (I)[J]. Journal of Tea Busines, 1988(1): 15-18.
[3] 赵冬香, 陈宗懋, 程家安. 茶小绿叶蝉优势种的归属[J]. 茶叶科学, 2000, 20(2): 101-104.
Zhao D X, Chen Z M, Cheng J A.Belongingnes of tea leaf-hopper dominant species[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2000, 20(2): 101-104.
[4] Fu J Y, Han B Y, Xiao Q.Mitochondrial COI and 16sRNA evidence for a single species hypothesis of E. vitis, J. formosana and E. onukii in East Asia[J]. Plos One, 2014, 9(12): e115259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115259.
[5] Qin D Z, Zhang L, Xiao Q, et al.Clarification of the identity of the tea green leafhopper based on morphological comparison between Chinese and Japanese Specimens[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(9): e0139202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139202.
[6] 彭萍, 唐敏, 侯渝嘉, 等. 黄板诱杀茶园黑刺粉虱及假眼小绿叶蝉效果及特性研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 2010, 23(1): 87-90.
Peng P, Tang M, Hou Y J, et al.Study on the effect and characteristics of yellow sticky trap sticking Aleurocanthus spiniferus and Empoasca vitis Gothe in tea garden[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 23(1): 87-90.
[7] 王念武, 徐金汉, 陈峥, 等. 不同茶园假眼小绿叶蝉抗药性比较[J]. 福建农业大学学报, 2004, 33(2): 169-173.
Wang N Y, Xu J H, Chen Z, et al.Resistance level of Empoasca vitis (Gothe) in different tea plantations[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2004, 33(2): 169-173.
[8] 刘丽芳. 茶树不同品种和次生代谢物质对叶蝉取食行为的影响的DC-EPG研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
Liu L F.Studies on effect of various cultivars and secondary metabolites of tea plants to tea green leafhopper feeding by DC-EPG [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011.
[9] 金珊, 孙晓玲, 陈宗懋, 等. 不同茶树品种对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(2): 255-265.
Jin S, Sun X L, Chen Z M, et al.Resistance of different tea cultivars to Empoasca vitis Göthe[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(2): 255-265.
[10] 王蔚, 吴满容, 张思校, 等. 茶小绿叶蝉在福建省茶树品种上的选择机制初探[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(4): 80-84.
Wang W, Wu M R, Zhang S X, et al.Preliminary study on selection mechanism of Empoasca onukii on tea varieties in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45(4): 80-84.
[11] 赵延霞. 沙棘组织结构及对沙棘木蠹蛾的抗虫性[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012.
Zhao Y X.Tissue structure of sea buckthorn and insect Resistance to Holcocerus hippophaecolus [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012.
[12] 李雅菲. 菊花和除虫菊腺体形态结构和内含物与其抗蚜性的相关性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.
Li Y F.Comparative study on the morphology and inelusions of triehomes and aphids-resistance between florist's chrysanthemum cultivars and pyrethrum [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011.
[13] 邢光南, 谭连美, 刘泽稀楠, 等. 大豆地方品种叶片叶柄茸毛性状的形态变异及其与豆卷叶螟抗性的相关分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5): 691-696.
Xing G N, Tan L M, Liu Z X N, et al. Morphological variation of pubescence on leaf blade and petiole and their correlation with resistance to Bean Pyralid (Lamprosema indicata Fabricius) in soybean landraces[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(5): 691-696.
[14] Hasanuzzaman A T M, Islam M N, Zhang Y, et al. Leaf morphological characters can be a factor for intra-varietal preference of whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) among eggplant varieties[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(4): e0153880.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153880.
[15] Halder J, Sanwal S K, Deb D, et al.Mechanisms of physical and biochemical basis of resistance against leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula ) in different okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) genotypes[J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 86(4): 481-484.
[16] 王庆森, 黄建, 陈常颂, 等. 茶树种质叶片组织结构与其对黑刺粉虱抗虫性的关系[J]. 茶叶科学, 2009, 29(1): 60-66.
Wang Q S, Huang J, Chen C S, et al.Relationship between leaf structure of tea germplasm and its resistance to Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance)[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2009, 29(1): 60-66.
[17] 叶火香, 韩善捷, 韩宝瑜. 假眼小绿叶蝉趋色性及茶梢信息物质强化其趋色性的效应[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2015, 42(6): 868-872.
Ye H X, Han S J, Han B Y.Phototaxis of tea green leafhopper and strengthening effect of infochemicals from tea shoots on its phototaxis[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2015, 42(6): 868-872.
[18] 金珊. 不同茶树品种抗假眼小绿叶蝉机理研究[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2012.
Jin S.Resistance Mechanisms of tea plant cultivars to tea green leafhopper [D]. Xi′an: Northwest A&F University, 2012.
[19] 郭贵明, 苏芝业, 杨伦伦, 等. 麦长管蚜蜜露分泌量与小麦品种的关系研究初报[J]. 山西大学学报, 1993, 16(2): 228-231.
Guo G M, Su Z Y, Yang L L, et al.A preliminary report on the relationship between the Macrosiphum avenae (Fab.) honeydew secretion and wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Shanxi University, 1993, 16(2): 228-231.
[20] 周晓静, 白素芬, 李欣, 等. 蜜露检测法在转基因棉抗蚜性指标中的应用[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2012, 46(1): 53-57.
Zhou X J, Bai S F, Li X, et al.Application of honeydew colormetry in determining indexes of aphid resistance of transgenic insect resistant cottons[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2012, 46(1): 53-57.
[21] 钦俊德. 植食性昆虫食性的生理基础[J]. 昆虫学报, 1980, 23(1): 106-122.
Qin J D.The physiological basis of herbivores[J]. Acta Entomologica, 1980, 23(1): 106-122.
[22] Mick E Hanley, Byron B L, Meredith M F, et al.Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2007, 8(4): 157-178.
[23] Patricia G Z, Alfonso E, Josefa B.Costs of leaf reinforcement in response to winter cold in evergreen species[J]. Tree Physiology, 2016, 36(3): 273-286.
[24] Duy N, Ivo R, Celestina M.How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2016, 91: 727-740.
[25] 曹贺贺. 小麦对麦长管蚜的组成抗性和诱导抗性研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.
Cao H H.Constitutive and indecud defenses of wheat against Sitobion Avenae [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2014.
[26] 赵曼. 不同玉米品种(系)对玉米蚜抗性机制的初步研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2013.
Zhao M.Prelimiary research on the resistance mechanism of different maize hybrids (inbreds) to Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2013.
[27] 李喜旺, 辛肇军, 孙晓玲. 利用黄板监测不同茶树品种(品系)上黑刺粉虱成虫的种群消长及日节律变化[J]. 茶叶学报, 2015, 56(1): 51-55.
Li X W, Xin Z J, Sun X L.Monitoring population dynamic and circadian rhythm of Aleurocanthus spiniferus adults on different tea varieties (strains) by using yellow sticky trap[J]. Acta Tea Sinica, 2015, 56(1): 51-55.
[28] Escobar-Bravo R, Klinkhamer P G L, Leiss K A. Induction of jasmonic acid-associated defenses by thrips alters host suitability for conspecififics and correlates with increased trichome densities in tomato[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2017, 58(3): 622-634.
[29] 林凤敏, 吴敌, 陆宴辉, 等. 棉花叶片茸毛性状与绿盲蝽抗性的关系[J]. 植物保护学报, 2010, 37(2): 165-171.
Lin F M, Wu D, Lu Y H, et al.The relationship between trichome characteristics of cotton leaves and the resistance to Apolygus lucorμm[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2010, 37(2): 165-171.
[30] 桂连友, 龚信文, 孟国玲. 茄子叶片绒毛与侧多食跗线螨抗性的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(1): 229-232.
Gui L Y, Gong X W, Meng G L.Relationship between eggplant leaf pubescent and its resistance to Polyphagotarsonemus latus[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(1): 229-232.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献