欢迎访问《茶叶科学》,今天是
研究报告

内山六安瓜片4个等级茶叶香气的组成及其差异

  • 范培珍 ,
  • 潘铖 ,
  • 王梦馨 ,
  • 崔林 ,
  • 韩宝瑜
展开
  • 1.六安职业技术学院,安徽 六安 237158;
    2.中国计量大学浙江省生物计量与检验检疫技术重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310018
范培珍,女,副教授,主要从事农产品加工研究,fanpeizhen@126.com。

收稿日期: 2020-02-15

  修回日期: 2020-04-24

  网络出版日期: 2020-10-10

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1604402)、荷兰Solidaridad(禾众)基金会项目(SOL 2010/714)

Differences in Volatile Aroma Compositions among Four Quality Grades of Mountain Lu'an Guapian Tea

  • FAN Peizhen ,
  • PAN Cheng ,
  • WANG Mengxin ,
  • CUI Lin ,
  • HAN Baoyu
Expand
  • 1. Lu'an Vocational and Technical College, Lu'an 237158, China;
    2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection and Quarantine, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received date: 2020-02-15

  Revised date: 2020-04-24

  Online published: 2020-10-10

摘要

为深入探究历史名茶六安瓜片不同等级间香气组分和含量的差异,选用内山六安瓜片特级、一级、二级和三级茶叶样品,以SDE法提取香精油,使用GC-MS配合标样做定性分析,加入癸酸乙酯为内标进行相对定量分析。结果表明,从4个等级的茶叶香精油中共鉴定香气成分96种,包括20种醇、18种酯、17种烯烃、16种醛、12种酮、7种杂环化合物和少量酸类;主要成分为芳樟醇、香叶醇、橙花叔醇、β-紫罗酮、己酸-顺-3-己烯酯、苯甲醛、棕榈酸、芳香醇氧化物Ⅰ型、β-环柠檬醛、α-紫罗酮、顺-3-己烯-1-醇、庚醛和壬醛;从特级、一级、二级至三级,香气成分个数分别为79、60、55个和47个,相对于内标的含量分别为695.94、579.90、541.69和268.50,香气成分个数和香气总含量呈梯度递减;4个等级茶叶的共有高含量香气成分为芳樟醇、橙花叔醇、α-紫罗酮、β-紫罗酮、己酸-顺-3-己烯酯,其含量随着等级降低而减少。六安瓜片的香气化合物包含多种类型且存在一些较稳定的高含量香气化合物,显露清香高爽的香型特征,但4个茶叶等级之间香气组分和含量的差异十分明显。

本文引用格式

范培珍 , 潘铖 , 王梦馨 , 崔林 , 韩宝瑜 . 内山六安瓜片4个等级茶叶香气的组成及其差异[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020 , 40(5) : 665 -675 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2020.05.012

Abstract

In order to thoroughly investigate aroma volatile compositions of the historically famous Lu'an Guapian tea, and evaluate their differences among the four quality grades: the super grade, the first grade, the second grade and the third grade, the tea samples processed in the internal mountains of Lu'an, Anhui Province, China were collected and analyzed. Essential oils from each of the four grades of tea samples were extracted by simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE), and then analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The volatile aroma constituents were identified by comparison of mass spectra and retention times with those of authentic standards, and quantified by their relative abundances to the internal standard, ethyl decanoate. A total of 96 aromatic compounds were identified from the four grade teas, including 20 alcohols, 18 esters, 17 alkenes, 16 aldehydes, 12 ketones, 7 heterocyclic compounds and a few organic acids. The major aromatic constituents were linalool, geraniol, cis-nerolidol, β-ionone, cis-3-hexenyl hexanoate, benzaldehyde, n-hexadecanoic acid, linalool oxide I, β-cyclocitral, α-ionone, Z-3-hexen-1-ol, heptanal and nonanal. The numbers and total abundances relative to the internal standard of these identified aromatic constituents from the super grade, the 1st grade, the 2nd grade and the 3rd grade were 79/695.94, 60/579.90, 55/541.69, and 47/268.50, respectively. Both the numbers and total abundances were positively related to the tea quality. The tea quality was positively correlated with the number and abundance of aromatic compounds. Conversely, the major aroma components, linalool, cis-nerolidol, α-ionone, β-ionone and cis-3-hexenyl hexanoate, were significantly reduced with the tea quality grades decreased. It was concluded that the high contents of diversified aromatic constituents, especially their major identified constituents in the Lu'an Guapian teas are probably responsible for its overall pleasant and refreshing scent and flavor. However, there were still significant differences in both aromatic constituents and their total abundances, thus also the fragrances, among the four quality grades.

参考文献

[1] 陈林, 余文权, 张应根, 等. 基于SDE和HS-SPME/GC-MS的乌龙茶香气组成特征分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(6): 692-704.
Chen L, Yu W Q, Zhang Y G, et al.Aroma profiling of oolong tea by SDE and HS-SPME in combination with GC-MS[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2019, 39(6): 692-704.
[2] 王梦琪, 邵晨阳, 朱荫, 等. 龙井茶香气成分的产区差异分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 508-517.
Wang M Q, Shao C Y, Zhu Y, et al.Aroma constituents of Longjing tea produced in different areas[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(5): 508-517.
[3] 张新亭, 王梦馨, 韩宝瑜. 3个不同地域龙井茶香气组成异同的解析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(4): 344-354.
Zhang X T, Wang M X, Han B Y.Analysis on similarities and differences of aromatic composition in Longjing teas from three producing regions[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2014, 34(4): 344-354.
[4] 尹洪旭, 杨艳芹, 姚月凤, 等. 栗香绿茶香气萃取方法优化及其芳香成分分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 518-526.
Yin H X, Yang Y Q, Yao Y F, et al.Optimization of aroma extraction and aroma component analysis on chestnut-like green tea[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(5): 518-526.
[5] 江俞蓉, 刘思彤, 高静, 等. 六安瓜片拉老火“起霜”的形成机制及其对茶叶品质的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 487-495.
Jiang Y R, Liu S T, Gao J, et al.The mechanism of frost-like powder and its effects on Lu′anguapian tea quality[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(5): 487-495.
[6] 丁以寿. 六安瓜片茶创制历史钩沉[J]. 茶业通报, 2016, 40(1): 44-48.
Ding Y S.Retrospect of processed history of Liu'anguapian tea[J]. Bulletin of Tea Business, 2016, 40(1): 44-48.
[7] 阮鸣, 陈全战, 周红霞. 六安瓜片香气成分的GC-MS分析[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(8): 120-124.
Ruan M, Chen Q Z, Zhou H X.Aroma composition analysis of Lu’an Guapian green tea by GC-MS[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(8): 120-124.
[8] 范培珍, 薄晓培, 王梦馨, 等. 4个等级内山六安瓜片茶叶氨基酸的组成及差异[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2017, 44(1): 14-21.
Fan P Z, Bo X P, Wang M X, et al.Similarities and differences in composition of amino acids in four grades of Liu'an Neishan Guapian tea[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2017, 44(1): 14-21.
[9] 陈宗懋. 中国茶叶大辞典[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2000: 323-359.
Chen Z M.China tea big dictionary [M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2000: 323-359.
[10] 梁颖, 李艺, 张留娟, 等. 食用农产品特征性品质指标筛选方法探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(18): 3155-3162.
Liang Y, Li Y, Zhang L J, et al.Discussion on the definition and screening method of characteristic quality indicators of edible agricultural products[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(18): 3155-3162.
[11] 安徽省质量技术监督局. 地理标志产品六安瓜片茶: DB 34/T 237—2017[S]. 六安: 2017.
Anhui Quality and Technology Supervision Bureau. Product of geographical indication Lu'an Guapian tea: DB 34/T 237—2017[S]. Lu'an: 2017.
[12] 范培珍, 王梦馨, 朱慧怡, 等. 不同等级霍山黄芽茶叶香气成分定性定量分析与评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(3): 275-280.
Fan P Z, Wang M X, Zhu H Y, et al.Qualitative and quantitative analysis and evaluation on components of aroma of different grades of Huoshanhuangya teas[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(3): 275-280.
[13] 孙君, 朱留刚, 林志坤, 等. 变温烘焙技术对丹桂乌龙茶香气品质的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2017, 37(3): 266-272.
Sun J, Zhu L G, Lin Z K, et al.Effects of changeable baking techniques on aroma quality of Dangui Oolong tea[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2017, 37(3): 266-272.
[14] Zhu Y, Lv H P, Shao C Y, et al.Identification of key odorants responsible for chestnut-like aroma quality of green teas[J]. Food Research International, 2018, 108: 74-82.
[15] Wang M Q, Ma W J, Shi J, et al.Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Longjing tea using stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O), odor activity value (OAV), and aroma recombination[J]. Food Research International, 2020, 130: 108908. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108908.
[16] Flaig M, Qi S, Wei G D, et al.Characterization of the key odorants in a high-grade Chinese green tea beverage (Camellia sinensis; Jingshan cha) by means of the sensomics approach and elucidation of odorant changes in tea leaves caused by the tea manufacturing process[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020, 68(18): 5168-5179.
文章导航

/