茶网蝽安全防治药剂与高效施药技术研究

罗鸿; 崔清梅; 蔡晓明; 罗逢健; 张强; 陈宗懋

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.20210407.001

茶叶科学 >

2021 , Vol. 41 >Issue 3: 361 - 370

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13305/j.cnki.jts.20210407.001

研究报告

茶网蝽安全防治药剂与高效施药技术研究

罗鸿 ,
崔清梅 ,
蔡晓明 ,
罗逢健 ,
张强 ,
陈宗懋

展开

1.恩施土家族苗族自治州农业科学院,湖北恩施 445000;
2.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江杭州 310008

罗鸿,女,农艺师,主要从事茶树病虫害研究,2209315658@qq.com。

收稿日期: 2020-09-30

修回日期: 2020-10-20

网络出版日期: 2021-06-15

基金资助

财政部和农业农村部: 国家现代农业产业技术体系（CARS-19）、恩施州重点人才工作项目（恩施州人才文〔2014〕1号）

收起

Study on the Safe Pesticides and Efficient Application Method Against Tea Lace Bug (Stephanitis chinensis Drake)

LUO Hong ,
CUI Qingmei ,
CAI Xiaoming ,
LUO Fengjian ,
ZHANG Qiang ,
CHEN Zongmao

Expand

1. Enshi Tujia Miao Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Enshi 445000, China;
2. Tea Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China

Received date: 2020-09-30

Revised date: 2020-10-20

Online published: 2021-06-15

Fold

摘要

近年来,我国部分茶区茶网蝽暴发成灾,缺乏高效安全防治技术。以低水溶性化学农药、植物源农药为对象,从施药方法、药剂种类、药剂浓度、农药残留等方面,研究了茶网蝽药剂防治技术。结果表明,背负式机动弥雾机施药的防效显著高于背负式电动喷雾器,且防效随施药用水量增加显著提高。8种低水溶性化学农药单剂中,联苯菊酯、高效氯氰菊酯、甲氰菊酯对茶网蝽具有很好的防效,其有效成分用量分别在1.31、22.50、11.25 g·hm^-2时,施药后7 d防效可达90%以上,且干茶中的农药残留量均低于中国、欧盟等规定的最大残留限量标准;唑虫酰胺效果次之,施药后7 d防效为60%~70%;而虫螨腈、乙基多杀菌素、茚虫威、噻嗪酮等低水溶性农药的防治效果均不理想。3种复配化学农药中,高氯·吡丙醚效果最好,施药后7 d防效可达89%。3组植物源农药中,除虫菊素效果最好,其有效成分用量在45.00 g·hm^-2时,施药后7 d防效可达90%;印楝素与藜芦碱混配、印楝素与苦参碱混配,对茶网蝽的防治效果均不理想。综上所述,通过背负式机动弥雾机施用拟除虫菊酯类化学农药和除虫菊素,是一种高效安全防治茶网蝽的方法。

关键词： 茶网蝽; 防治药剂; 施药技术

本文引用格式

罗鸿 , 崔清梅 , 蔡晓明 , 罗逢健 , 张强 , 陈宗懋 . 茶网蝽安全防治药剂与高效施药技术研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021 , 41(3) : 361 -370 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.20210407.001

Abstract

In recent years, the tea lace bugs have broken out in some tea areas of China, and there is an urgent need for an efficient and safe control technology. In this paper, the safe and efficient control technology against tea lace bug was studied from aspects of application methods, types of pesticides, applied dosage and pesticide residues. The control efficiency of knapsack mist sprayer was significantly higher than that of knapsack electric sprayer, and the control efficiency was significantly increased with the increase of water consumption. Among the 8 single-dose chemical pesticides, bifenthrin, beta-cypermethrin and fenpropathrin showed good control effects on tea lace bugs with the control effects higher than 90% 7 d after application. Their dosages of active ingredients were 1.31 g·hm^-2, 22.50 g·hm^-2 and 11.25 g·hm^-2, respectively. Moreover, the pesticide residues in tea were all lower than the maximum residue limit standards from China and the European Union. The control effect of tolfenpyrad could be up to 70% 7 d after application. But the control effects of chlorfenapyr, spinetoram, indoxacarb, and buprofezin were not satisfactory. The control effect of beta-cypermethrin·pyriproxyfen was the best among the 3 compound chemical pesticides, and could reach to 89% 7 d after application. Among the 3 group botanical pesticides, the control effect of pyrethrum was the best, which could be up to 90% 7 d after application when the active ingredient was 45.00 g·hm^-2. The mixture of azadirachtin and veratrine and the mixture of azadirachtin and matrine did not show good control effects. These results indicate that the application of pyrethroids and pyrethrum through knapsack mist sprayer was an effective and safe control technology against the tea lace bugs.

Key words： tea lace bug; pesticides; pesticide application technology

参考文献

[1] 王朝禹. 茶脊冠网蝽生物学及其防治[J]. 昆虫知识, 1988(6): 339-341.
Wang C Y.Biology and control of the tea ridged stink bug[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 1988(6): 339-341.
[2] 于忠明, 李瑞清, 甘立奎, 等. 5种杀虫剂防控茶树茶网蝽试验初报[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2016, 37(7): 48-50.
Yu Z M, Li R Q, Gan L K, et al.Preliminary report on the efficacies of 5 insecticides against tea lacebug[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2016, 37(7): 48-50.
[3] 张锡友, 罗碧安, 孙光德, 等. 陕南茶网蝽蔓延威胁及有效防控对策思考[J]. 茶业通报, 2017, 39(3): 130-132.
Zhang X Y, Luo B A, Sun G D, et al.The threat of tea net bug spreading in southern Shaanxi and its effective control countermeasures[J]. Journal of Tea Business, 2017, 39(3): 130-132.
[4] 吴平昌, 李尤学. 陕南茶区茶网蝽发生现状和防控研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2014, 60(3): 73-76.
Wu P C, Li Y X.Study on occurrence and control of tea stink bug in southern Shaanxi[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 60(3): 73-76.
[5] 李增义, 陈宏, 涂作菊, 等. 安康市茶脊冠网蝽发生动态及综合防控技术[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2018, 38(1): 58-61.
Li Z Y, Chen H, Tu Z J, et al.Occurrence dynamics and integrated prevention and control technology of tea ridgehead stink bug in Ankang City[J]. China Plant Protection, 2018, 38(1): 58-61.
[6] 李增义, 寇长福, 朱陵侠, 等. 4种药剂对茶脊冠网蝽防效试验[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2017, 63(10): 65-66.
Li Z Y, Kou C F, Zhu L X, et al.Control effect of four insecticides on the stink bug[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 63(10): 65-66.
[7] Chen Z M, Zhou L, Yang M, et al.Index design and safety evaluation of pesticides application based on a fuzzy AHP model for beverage crops: tea as a case study[J]. Pest Management Science, 2019, 76(2): 520-526.
[8] Wang X R, Zhou L, Zhang X Z, et al.Transfer of pesticide residue during tea brewing: Understanding the effects of pesticide's physico-chemical parameters on its transfer behavior[J]. Food Research International, 2019, 121: 776-784.
[9] 吴平昌, 马荣彬, 钟运昆, 等. 不同浓度的高氯·啶虫脒防治茶网蝽显著性分析[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2016(10): 27-28.
Wu P C, Ma R B, Zhong Y K, et al.Control effect of acetamiprid at different concentrations on tea stink bug[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016(10): 27-28.
[10] Zhou L, Luo F J, Zhang X Z, et al.Dissipation, transfer and safety evaluation of emamectin benzoate in tea[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 202: 199-204.
[11] 朱毅征, 黄德民, 刘林台. 背真式机动弥雾喷粉机(WFB-30)设计研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 1966, 9(3): 258-264.
Zhu Y Z, Huang D M, Liu L T.Design and research on the back true motorized mist sprayer (WFB-30)[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1966, 9(3): 258-264.
[12] 朱金文, 吴慧明, 孙立峰. 叶片倾角、雾滴大小与施药液量对毒死蜱在水稻植株沉积的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2004, 31(3): 259-263.
Zhu J W, Wu H M, Sun L F.Influence of leaf incline angle, droplet size and spray volume on deposition of chlorpyrifos on rice plants[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2004, 31(3): 259-263.
[13] 朱金文, 吴慧明, 朱国念, 等. 施药液量对农药药理作用的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2003, 15(6): 372-375.
Zhu J W, Wu H M, Zhu G N, et al.A review of influence of spray volume on pesticides efficacy[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2003, 15(6): 372-375.
[14] 陈世春, 彭萍, 鲁成业, 等. 10种药剂防治茶网蝽田间药效试验[J]. 茶叶学报, 2019, 60(2): 85-87.
Chen S C, Peng P, Lu C Y, et al.Efficacies of ten pesticides on controlling Stephanotis chinensis Drake at tea plantations[J]. Acta Tea Sinica, 2019, 60(2): 85-87.
[15] 中国农业百科全书总编辑委员会茶业卷编辑委员会. 中国农业百科全书: 茶业卷[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1988: 37.
China Agricultural Encyclopedia General Editorial Committee Tea Volume Editorial Committee. Encyclopedia of agriculture in China: tea trade volume [M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1988: 37.
[16] 肖方扬. 24%虫螨腈悬浮剂防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉的效果[J]. 农技服务, 2013, 30(1): 46.
Xiao F Y.Control effect of 24% chlorfenapyr SC on Empoasca vitis[J]. Agricultural Technology Service, 2013, 30(1): 46.
[17] 柳采秀, 方屹豪, 苍涛, 等. 6 种杀虫剂防治小贯小绿叶蝉田间药效评价[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(12): 2212-2213.
Liu C X, Fang Y H, Cang T, et al.Evaluation of field efficacy of six insecticides on tea green leafhopper[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 59(12): 2212-2213.
[18] 赵之德, 李嘉慧, 梁涛, 等. 联苯菊酯、溴氰菊酯、虫螨腈对茶园害虫的田间防效[J]. 农药, 2019, 58(2): 130-135.
Zhao Z D, Li J H, L T, et al. Differences in field control efficacy treated with two concentrations of bifenthrin, deltamethrin, chlorfenapyr in tea plantations[J]. Agrochemicals, 2019, 58(2): 130-135.
[19] 吕闰强, 苏亮. 茚虫威对茶尺蠖幼虫室内毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 中国茶叶, 2017, 39(8): 26-27.
Lv R Q, Su L.Toxicity test and field control effect of indoxacarb on tea geometrid larvae[J]. China Tea, 2017, 39(8): 26-27.
[20] 王彭, 林冠华, 黄大益, 等. 乙基多杀菌素防治不同作物蓟马田间药效试验[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(10): 771-774.
Wang P, Lin G H, Huang D Y, et al.Field efficacy of spinetoram against thrips pests on multiple different crops[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(10): 771-774.
[21] Ozawa A.Effects of pyriproxyfen application for mulberry scale, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Targioni), on the plucking yield of tea crop[J]. Annual Report of the Kansai Plant Protection Society, 2012, 54: 177-179.
[22] 邓英立, 丁燕, Richards N G J, 等. 天然除虫菊酯化学成分制备分离及光稳定性研究[J]. 世界农药, 2020, 42(5): 28-35, 45.
Deng Y L, Ding Y, Richards N G J, et al. Study on the preparation, separation of effective chemical components from natural pyrethrins and its photostability[J]. World Pesticides, 2020, 42(5): 28-35, 45.
[23] 刘雨晴, 赵天增, 董建军, 等. 天然除虫菊的研究及开发应用[J]. 河南科学, 2013, 31(8): 1151-1155.
Liu Y Q, Zhao T Z, Dong J J, et al.Research and development of natural insecticidal pyrethrins[J]. Henan Science, 2013, 31(8): 1151-1155.
[24] 张夏亭. 天然除虫菊的开发及应用[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2002, 23(2): 25-26, 34.
Zhang X T.Development and application of natural pyrethrum[J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2002, 23(2): 25-26, 34.
[25] 四川省苗溪茶场茶叶科学研究所. 茶脊冠网蝽的主要天敌——军配盲蝽[J]. 昆虫知识, 1979(2): 69-72.
Tea Science Research Institute of Sichuan Miaoxi Tea Farm. The main natural enemies of the tea ridged stink bug: Stethoconus japonicus Schumacher[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 1979(2): 69-72.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献