The arthropod communities were investigated by sampling at an interval of two months for one year in four types of tea plantations: organic tea plantation (OTP), tri-row dense tea tree plantation (TRDTTP), and high yield tea plantation (HYTP) Every types of tea garden planted the Anjibaicha tea cultivar with the same tea plant age, as well as the tea cultivar garden (TCG) growing with Anjibaicha, Longjin 43 and other over forty cultivars. The results showed that: ① Species richness and abundance of natural enemies decreased progressively from TCG, OTP, TRDTTP to HYTP, whilst the total abundance in TRDTTP was the highest among the four types of tea plantations. ② For the vertical stratification of arthropod communities, higher species richness and abundance of the natural enemies in HYTP, TRDTTP and TCG existed at the middle layer of tea plant than in the other layers, whereas the highest species richness and abundance occurred at the upper layer in OTP, the highest species richness of various pests occurred at the middle layer of tea plant in HYTP, TRDTTP and TCG, and at the upper layer in OTP; the highest abundance (overall individual numbers) of pests existed at the lower layer in HYTP and TRDTTP, and at the middle layer in TCG and OTP. ③ Horizontally, the sum of species richness and the sum of abundance of the natural enemies toward the eastward and the westward were more than those toward the southward and the northward in the all plantations except TCG. ④ The species richness and the abundance of pests existed in the inner layers of tea canopies were slightly higher than those in the outer layers for all four tea plantations, whilst the species richness and the abundance of the natural enemies occurred in outer layers were slightly more than those in the inner layers. ⑤ A relatively low species richness was recorded from December to February (overwinter period), while higher species richnesses were detected in April, June and October. ⑥ The diversity indices of arthropod communities decreased progressively from OTP, TCG, HYTP to TRDTTP. It is suggested that the different field management models (different types of tea plantations) might lead to the significant differences in the temporal and spatial patterns (structures) and the diversity of the arthropod communities in tea plantations.
PAN Cheng
,
HAN Shanjie
,
HAN Baoyu
. Effect of Various Field Management Models on Temporal and Spatial Patterns and Diversity of Arthropod Community in Four Types of Tea Plantations[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2015
, 35(4)
: 316
-322
.
DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2015.04.002
[1] 谭济才, 邓欣, 袁哲明, 等. 南岳茶场害虫—天敌群落结构及季节动态[J]. 植物保护学报, 1997, 24(4): 341-346.
[2] 邓欣, 谭济才. 生态控制茶园内害虫、天敌种类及数量的季节变化规律[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(7): 1166-1172.
[3] 谭济才, 邓欣, 袁哲明. 不同类型茶园昆虫、蜘蛛群落结构分析[J]. 生态学报, 1998, 18(3): 289-294.
[4] 陈亦根, 熊锦君, 黄明度, 等. 茶园节肢动物类群多样性性和稳定性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(5): 875-878.
[5] 黎健龙, 唐劲驰, 赵超艺, 等. 不同景观斑块结构对茶园节肢动物多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5): 1305-1312.
[6] 韩宝瑜, 江昌俊, 李卓民. 间作密植和单行茶园节肢动物群落组成差异[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(4): 646-652.
[7] Hazarika L K, Bhuyan M, Hazarika B N.Insect pests of tea and their management[J]. Annual of Review of Entomology, 2009, 54: 267-284.
[8] Gnanapragasam N C, Sivepalan P.Eco-friendly management of tea plantations towards sustainability[J]. International Journal of Tea Science, 2004, 3(3/4): 139-146.
[9] 杨普云, 赵中华. 农作物病虫害绿色防控技术指南[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2012: 9-26, 113-123.
[10] 韩宝瑜. 茶园昆虫群落时空格局及多样性稳定性[J]. 茶叶科学, 1997, 17(1): 27-32.
[11] 苏红飞, 杨柳霞, 郑文忠, 等. 混交模式对茶园产量、天敌和主要害虫的影响研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(2): 122-128.