Cultural identity refers to the essential character of an ethnic group’s culture, which never stop creating and changing. Since tea has been widely accepted by different classes of society from various ethnic around the world, tea culture is abundant with diversity. As history tells us, the development of tea culture has been in maturity since the Tang Dynasty, which defined a time period, as well as an identity of major ethnic in China. This paper takes the Tea Saint Lu Yu, the founder of Chinese classic tea study, as a symbol for time division. By reviewing literature from the Tang Dynasty, it explains the reclusion as a cultural identity of drinking tea lifestyle in that period. That not only delivers a qualitative analysis for tea culture particularly in Tang Dynasty, but also lays a basic foundation for the study on relationship between Lu Yu and the tea. With this application of cultural identity theory, it involves the study on tea into the context of cultural research, thus to promote the study on tea culture in a more academic and professional way.
GUAN Jianping
. Reclusion: Cultural Identity of Tea Dringking in the Tang Dynasty[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2014
, 34(1)
: 105
-110
.
DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.01.013
[1] 乔治·拉伦. 意识形态与文化身份[M]. 戴从容, 译. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2005: 215.
[2] 斯图亚特·霍尔. 文化身份与族裔散居[M]//罗钢, 刘象愚. 文化研究读本. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2000: 211.
[3] 房玄龄, 褚遂良, 许敬宗. 晋书:卷98 桓温传[M]. 吴则虞, 点校. 北京: 中华书局, 1974: 2576.
[4] 房玄龄, 褚遂良, 许敬宗. 晋书:卷77 陆纳传[M]. 吴则虞, 点校. 北京: 中华书局, 1974: 2027.
[5] 陆羽. 茶经校注:卷下七之事[M]. 沈冬梅, 校注. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 49.
[6] 陆羽. 茶经校注:卷下七之事[M]. 沈冬梅, 校注. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 45, 47.
[7] 逯钦立. 先秦汉魏晋南北朝诗: 晋诗卷7[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1983: 740.
[8] 辛文房. 唐才子传笺证: 卷2 崔国辅传[M]. 周绍良, 笺证. 北京: 中华书局, 2010: 206.
[9] 彭定求, 沈三曾, 杨中讷, 等. 全唐诗:卷136[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1986: 315.
[10] 高桥忠彦. 从唐诗看唐代的茶与佛教[M]//关剑平. 禅茶: 历史与现实. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2010: 45.
[11] 李白. 李太白文集: 卷19[M]. 瞿蜕园, 朱金城, 校注. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1980: 1127.
[12] 释皎然. 皎然集:卷7[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1922: 7.
[13] 彭定求, 沈三曾, 杨中讷, 等. 全唐诗:卷193[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1986: 453.
[14] 储仲君. 韦应物诗分期的探讨[J]. 文学遗产, 1984(4): 67.
[15] 蒋寅. 大历诗人研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 81.
[16] 彭定求, 沈三曾, 杨中讷, 等. 全唐诗:卷468[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1986: 1187.
[17] 辛文房. 唐才子传笺证: 卷4 刘言史传[M]. 周绍良, 笺证. 北京:中华书局, 2010: 889.
[18] 陆羽. 茶经校注:卷下九之略[M]. 沈冬梅, 校注. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 101-102.
[19] 白居易. 白居易集笺校: 卷7[M]. 朱金城, 笺校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1988: 384.
[20] 杨雄. 扬子法言:卷5 问明篇[M]. 台北: 商务印书馆, 1986: 306.
[21] 白居易. 白居易集笺校: 卷22[M]. 朱金城, 笺校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1988: 1493.
[22] 白居易. 白居易集笺校: 卷45[M]. 朱金城, 笺校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1988: 2794-2795.
[23] 白居易. 白居易集笺校: 卷13[M]. 朱金城, 笺校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1988: 792.
[24] 刘禹锡. 刘宾客文集: 卷25[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1993: 158.
[25] 皮日休. 皮子文薮[M]. 萧涤非, 郑庆笃, 整理. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1981: 163.
[26] 欧阳修, 宋祁. 新唐书:卷196 隐逸陆龟蒙传[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1975: 5613.
[27] 陆羽. 茶经校注:卷上一之源[M]. 沈冬梅, 校注. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 2.
[28] 王弼, 韩康伯, 孔颖达. 宋本周易注疏: 卷3 上经否[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1988: 214.
李鼎祚. 周易集解: 卷12 否[M]. 李一忻, 点校. 北京: 九州出版社, 2003: 220.
浙公网安备 33019902000101号 
