Welcome to Journal of Tea Science,Today is
Research Paper

Analysis of the Differences in Physical and Chemical Indicators of Tea Product Quality Standards in China

  • LI Wenyan ,
  • ZHANG Lin ,
  • CHEN Liyan ,
  • ZHANG Yingbin ,
  • ZHOU Sujuan ,
  • HONG Yiwei ,
  • LIANG Sichen ,
  • SUN Hongfeng ,
  • CHEN Hongping
Expand
  • 1. Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310008, China;
    3. Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Tea Products (Hangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310008, China;
    4. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    5. Shanghai Kangshi Food Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201100, China;

Received date: 2024-07-17

  Revised date: 2024-08-27

  Online published: 2024-11-08

Abstract

Physical and chemical components, as the key substance of tea quality, to a certain extent determine the flavor, quality characteristics, and quality level of tea, thus becoming the key indicator of Chinese tea product standards. China has set up a variety of standards related to tea products, which have certain common characteristics and specificities. However, at present, there is little research on the physical and chemical indicator characteristics of Chinese tea product standards. We collected 227 national, industry, and local standards for tea and related products in China, including 20 physical and chemical indicators. Due to differences in origin, raw materials, processing technology and harvesting time, there is some variability in the requirements of physical and chemical indicators among different tea standards, but the direction of quality requirements is consistent. The number of green tea standards, as well as their physical and chemical index parameters are the most numerous and most demanding. The requirements of national standards for tea are generally lower than those of industry or local standards. Compared with national basic tea product standards, geographical indications for tea products are generally higher in terms of physical and chemical index requirements. This study provided a reference for the construction and improvement of the product quality standard system of tea products in China.

Cite this article

LI Wenyan , ZHANG Lin , CHEN Liyan , ZHANG Yingbin , ZHOU Sujuan , HONG Yiwei , LIANG Sichen , SUN Hongfeng , CHEN Hongping . Analysis of the Differences in Physical and Chemical Indicators of Tea Product Quality Standards in China[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2024 , 44(5) : 843 -852 . DOI: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.05.006

References

[1] 梅宇, 梁晓. 2023年我国茶叶产销及进出口形势分析[J]. 中国茶叶, 2024, 46(4): 18-26.
Mei Y, Liang X.Analysis of China's tea production, sales, import and export situation in 2023[J]. China Tea, 2024, 46(4): 18-26.
[2] Wang X C, Feng H, Chang Y X, et al.Population sequencing enhances understanding of tea plant evolution[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 4447. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18228-8.
[3] Fu Z P, Chen L Y, Zhou S J, et al.Analysis of differences in the accumulation of tea compounds under various processing techniques, geographical origins, and harvesting seasons[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 430: 137000. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137000.
[4] 毛雅琳, 汪芳, 尹军峰, 等. 不同茶树品种碾茶的品质分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(6): 782-794.
Mao Y L, Wang F, Yin J F, et al.Quality analysis of tencha made from different tea cultivars[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(6): 782-794.
[5] Tong M N, Chen X, Bai Y, et al.Quality characteristics of white leaf tea of ‘Baiye 1' ( Camellia sinensis ) in different producing areas[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(10): 2526. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13102526.
[6] 徐邢燕, 陈思, 俞晓敏, 等. 不同烘焙程度与等级武夷肉桂茶品质差异分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(13): 22-28.
Xu X Y, Chen S, Yu X M, et al.Quality differences of different grades of Wuyi Rougui tea with different baking degrees[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(13): 22-28.
[7] 陈倩莲, 王芳, 陈百文, 等. 环境湿度对大红袍做青品质的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(2): 593-598.
Chen Q L, Wang F, Chen B W, et al.Effects of environmental humidity on the quality of Dahongpao during Zuoqing process[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2022, 13(2): 593-598.
[8] 李荣林, 艾仄宜, 穆兵, 等. 不同干燥成形方式的白叶红茶品质分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(19): 6230-6237.
Li R L, Ai Z Y, Mu B, et al.Quality analysis on black tea made from albinos tea leaves under different drying-shaping ways[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2022, 13(19): 6230-6237.
[9] 熊利华. 近红外光谱法快速检测茶叶中粗纤维、水分和灰分的研究[D]. 上海: 东华理工大学, 2018: 1-2.
Xiong L H.The study on rapid determination of crude fiber, moisture and ash in tea by near infrared spectroscopy [D]. Shanghai: East China University of Technology, 2018: 1-2.
[10] 陈红平, 刘新, 鲁成银, 等. 茶叶内含物质与外源污染物在冲泡过程中的浸出规律[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(1): 63-76.
Chen H P, Liu X, Lu C Y, et al.Leaching pattern of internal substances and xenobiotic pollutants during tea brewing[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(1): 63-76.
[11] Liu S, Wang B, Lin L, et al.L-Theanine alleviates heat stress through modulation of gut microbiota and immunity[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2024, 104(4): 2059-2072.
[12] 叶秋萍, 余雯, 郑世仲, 等. 茉莉花茶窨制过程水分变化与香气品质变化的相关性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(24): 266-272.
Ye Q P, Yu W, Zheng S Z, et al.Correlation analysis of moisture content and aroma quality in the scenting process of jasmine tea[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(24): 266-272.
[13] 梅宇, 张朔. 2022年中国茶叶生产与内销形势分析[J]. 中国茶叶, 2023, 45(4): 25-30.
Mei Y, Zhang S.Analysis of China's tea production and domestic sales in 2022[J]. China Tea, 2023, 45(4): 25-30.
[14] 梅宇, 梁晓. 2018年中国茉莉花茶产销形势通报[J]. 中国茶叶加工, 2019(4): 21-25.
Mei Y, Zhang S. Chinese Jasmine Tea Production and Marketing Situation Report in2018 [J]. China Tea Processing, 2019(4): 21-25.
[15] 郭建军, 周艺, 王小英, 等. 贵州不同产区代表绿茶的品质特征及香气组分分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(5): 78-84, 92.
Guo J J, Zhou Y, Wang X Y, et al.Analysis of quality features and aroma components in Guizhou representative green tea[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(5): 78-84, 92.
[16] 张悦, 朱荫, 吕海鹏, 等. 不同海拔烘青绿茶的品质成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(2): 257-268.
Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lü H P, et al.Comparative analysis of quality components in baked green tea made from tea plants grown at different altitudes[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(2): 257-268.
[17] 刘盼盼, 郑鹏程, 龚自明, 等. 青砖茶渥堆工艺优化及风味物质分析[J]. 中国食品学报, 2021, 21(8): 224-234.
Liu P P, Zheng P C, Gong Z M, et al.Pile-fermentation process optimization and flavor components analysis Qingzhuan tea[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 21(8): 224-234.
[18] 刘晓慧, 王琼, 邓锶涵, 等. 不同等级软枝乌龙茶品质研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 37(3): 464-470.
Liu X H, Wang Q, Deng S H, et al.Study on the Ruanzhi oolong tea quality differences of different grades[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2022, 37(3): 464-470.
[19] 亓峥, 庞志强, 卢炜丽, 等. 云南不同茶树品种(系)叶性状及变异性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(7): 36-44.
Qi Z, Pang Z Q, Lu W L, et al.Leaf traits of different tea varieties (lines) in Yunnan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(7): 36-44.
[20] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 地理标志产品保护规定[EB/OL]. (2005-07-15) [2024-03-17] https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/bgt/art/2023/art_830512d8ecbf4225ae73f697dfc19457.html.
General Administration of Quality Supervision. Provisions on the protection of geographical indication products [EB/OL]. (2005-07-15) [2024-03-17] https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/bgt/art/2023/art_830512d8ecbf4225ae73f697dfc19457.html.
[21] Wu G H, Gu W, Cheng H J, et al.Huangshan Maofeng green tea extracts prevent obesity-associated metabolic disorders by maintaining homeostasis of gut microbiota and hepatic lipid classes in leptin receptor Knockout rats[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(19): 2939. doi: 10.3390/foods11192939.
[22] Wang T, Li R Y, Liu K Y, et al.Changes in sensory characteristics, chemical composition and microbial succession during fermentation of ancient plants Pu-erh tea[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2023, 20: 101003. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.101003.
Outlines

/