The effects of nitrogen transformation bacteria on micro-ecological environment of the rhizosphere soil of 2 years old tea plant were studied in Taian City of Shandong Province. The Bacillus subtilis (T1) and Azotobacter chroococcum (T2) were set up as inoculation treatments, and the noninoculation as the control in this research. The number of bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, ammonifying bacteria, azotobacter, nitrifying bacteria and the modification of microbial diversity in rhizosphere soil in different periods were measured, using the methods of culture counting and T-RFLP. Meanwhile, the nutrient contents in the soil were also determined. The results showed that the bacterial number of T1 and T2 were significantly higher than CK, but there were no significant impact on fungi and actinomycetes. In the whole test process, the number of ammonifying bacteria and azotobacter were higher than that of CK, among which ammonifying bacteria of T1 was the most, azotobacter of T2 was the most; the nitrifying bacteria numbers of CK was significantly higher than T1 and T2. Based on T-RFLP mapping analysis and compared with the control group, microbial diversity, the richness and evenness were rise in the bacterium treatments. The ammonium nitrogen concentration of T1 and T2 were significantly higher than that of CK, but the nitrate concentration were lower than that of CK. The available P concentration of T1 and T2 significantly increased by 8% and 25% for CK. Meanwhile, the available K concentration of T1 and T2 significantly increased by 15% and 11% for CK. The inoculation of Bacillus subtilis and Azotobacter chroococcum showed the positive effects, which could improve micro-ecological environment and soil nutrients of tea rhizospheric soil.
[1] 骆耀平. 茶树栽培学[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014: 93.
[2] 王莉. 农田氮素流失的特点及对环境的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1998(3): 48-50.
[3] Streerter T C, Bol R, Bardgeet R D.Amino acids as a nitrogen source in temperate upland grasslands : the use of dual labeled (13C,15N) glycine to test for direct uptake by dominant grasses[J]. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2000, 14: 1351-1355.
[4] Kiell. Amino acid absorption by arctic plants implications for plant nutrition and nitrogen and nutrigen cycling[J]. Ecology, 1994, 75: 2373-2383.
[5] 王艳杰, 邹国元, 付桦, 等. 土壤氮素矿化研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(10): 203-208.
[6] 孙建光, 张燕春, 徐晶, 等. 玉米根际高效固氮菌 Sphingomonas sp. GD542 的分离鉴定及接种效果初步研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(1): 89-93.
[7] 王娟, 戴习林, 宋增福. 一株氨化细菌的分离、鉴定及氨氮降解能力的初步分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2010, 34(6): 1198-1201.
[8] 周鑫斌, 洪坚平, 谢英荷. 溶磷细菌肥对石灰性土壤磷素转化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(6): 70-73.
[9] 李凤汀, 郝正然, 杨则瑗, 等. 硅酸盐细菌HM8841菌株解钾作用的研究[J]. 微生物学报, 1997, 37(1): 79-81.
[10] 李兰晓, 王海鹰, 杨涛, 等. 土壤微生物菌肥在盐碱地造林中的作用[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2005, 20(4): 60-63.
[11] 侯和平, 孙耀刚, 陈申宽, 等. 茂勃艾米乐微生物菌剂在茶叶上的应用效果[J]. 植物医生, 2013, 26(5): 36-38.
[12] 陈仲斌, 林允钦. 茶树施用九隆升微生物菌剂试验研究初报[J]. 茶叶科学技术, 2002(3): 13-14.
[13] 田永辉, 魏杰, 令狐昌弟, 等. 不同基因型茶树根系活力及根际土壤酶活性研究[J]. 贵州大学学报, 2002, 21(3): 219-223.
[14] 杨扬, 刘炳君, 房江育, 等. 不同植茶年龄茶树根际与非根际土壤微生物及酶活性特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(27): 118-121.
[15] 阮建云, 马立锋, 石元值. 茶树根际土壤性质及氮肥的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2003, 23(2): 167-170.
[16] 韩晓阳, 李智, 汪强强, 等. 茶园土壤高活性氨化菌的筛选鉴定及特性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2013, 33(1): 91-98.
[17] 韩晓阳, 李智, 张丽霞, 等. 茶园土壤高活性固氮菌的筛选鉴定及接种效果初步研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(5): 497-505.
[18] 沈萍. 微生物学实验[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 214-222.
[19] 姚槐应, 黄昌勇. 土壤微生物生态学及其实验技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 140-142.
[20] 袁三青, 薛燕芬, 高鹏, 等. T-RFLP技术分析油藏微生物多样性[J]. 微生物学报, 2007, 47(2): 290-294.
[21] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 46-49.
[22] 宋歌, 孙波, 教剑英. 测定土壤硝态氮的紫外分光光度法与其他方法的比较[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(2): 288-293.
[23] 逄焕成, 李玉义, 严慧峻, 等. 微生物菌剂对盐碱土理化和生物性状影响的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(5): 951-955.
[24] 蒲一涛, 钟毅沪, 郑宗坤. 混合培养对固氮菌和纤维素分解菌生长及固氮的影响[J]. 氨基酸和生物资源, 2000, 22(1): 1-4.
[25] 陈广波. 肥料和菌剂配施对红壤地区连作花生生育性状和土壤微生物多样性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012: 31-32.
[26] Probanza A, Mateos JL, Lucas Garcia JA, et al. Effects of inoculation with PGPR Bacillus and Pisolithus tinctorius on Pinus pinea L. Growth,bacterial rhizosphere colonization, and myeorrhizal infection[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2001, 41: 140-148.
[27] 雷先德, 李金文, 徐秀玲, 等. 微生物菌剂对菠菜生长特性及土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(4): 488-494.
[28] Kozdrój J, Trevors J T, van Elsas J D. Influence of introduced potential biocontrol agents on maize seedling growth and bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(11): 1775-1784.
[29] Kokalis-Burelle N, Kloepper J W, Reddy M S.Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as transplant amendments and their effects on indigenous rhizosphere microorganisms[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2006, 31(1/2): 91-100.
[30] Gonzalez JM, SimoR, Massana R, et al. Bacterial community structure associated with a dimethylsufonio-propionate- producing north atlantic algal bloom[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2000, 66(10): 4237-4246.
[31] Derakshani M, Lukow T, Liesack W.Novel bacterial lineages at the (sub) division level as detected by signature nucleotide-targeted recovery of 16S rRNA genes from bulk soil and rice roots of flooded rice microcosms[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2001, 67(2): 623-631.
[32] 李辉, 徐新阳, 李培军, 等. 人工湿地中氨化细菌去除有机氮的效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2(8): 1043-1047.
[33] Malik K A, RasulG, Hassan U, et al. Role of N2-fixing and growth hormones producing bacteria in improving growth of wheat and rice[C]//Hegazi NA. Proceedings of 6th Int Symposium on Nitrogen Fixation with Non-legumes. Egypt: Ismailia, 1994: 409-422.
[34] 崔晓亮. 核桃根际解磷、解钾、固氮菌株的筛选及分布特征研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009: 3-5.
浙公网安备 33019902000101号 
