基于无人机遥感的茶园多胁迫分层监测方法研究

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.010

茶叶科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 292-310.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.010

基于无人机遥感的茶园多胁迫分层监测方法研究

余盈潭^1,2, 袁琳^2,*, 聂臣巍², 金子晶³, 陈冬梅⁴, 李征珍⁵, 李鑫⁵

1.浙江理工大学信息科学与工程学院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.浙江水利水电学院计算机科学与技术学院,浙江杭州 310018;
3.浙江省农业技术推广中心,浙江杭州 310020;
4.杭州电子科技大学人工智能学院,浙江杭州 310018;
5.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江杭州 310008

收稿日期:2025-09-26 修回日期:2025-12-09 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-04-22
通讯作者: ^*yuanl_rs@163.com
作者简介:余盈潭,女,硕士研究生,主要从事无人机遥感病虫害监测方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（42371385）; 浙江省自然科学基金（LTGN23D010002、ZCLZ24F0201）; 杭州市自然科学基金（2024SZRYBD010001）

A Multi-step Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Approach for Monitoring Stresses in Tea Garden

YU Yingtan^1,2, YUAN Lin^2,*, NIE Chenwei², JIN Zijing³, CHEN Dongmei⁴, LI Zhengzhen⁵, LI Xin⁵

1. School of Information Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2. School of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China;
3. Zhejiang Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hangzhou 310020, China;
4. School of Artificial Intelligence, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
5. Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China

Received:2025-09-26 Revised:2025-12-09 Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 茶树[Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]是我国重要的经济作物,其生产过程易受到病虫害等胁迫的影响,进而造成产量和品质下降。因此,对茶园胁迫精准监测是实现茶园精细化管理的关键环节。以茶尺蠖（Ectropis obliqua）、热害和炭疽病（Colletotrichum camelliae）3种典型胁迫为对象,提出了一种基于无人机遥感的茶园多胁迫分层监测方法。研究首先针对茶园垄行结构的特点,结合RedEdge波段下的决策树与边缘检测算法（DT-ED）,实现了茶行的高精度提取;其次,考虑到胁迫在茶园中的空间分布差异,基于地块光谱变异系数（CV）和线性判别分析（LDA）,进一步构建了地块类型判别模型（整体健康、整体异常、局部异常）,总体精度达到94.7%。在此基础上,针对整体异常和健康地块,采用无人机五点抽样法进行胁迫评估与健康状态验证;针对局部异常地块,则通过“异常区识别-胁迫类型判别”的两步策略展开监测,其中异常区利用“两阶段聚类策略”划分。分别采用支持向量机（SVM）、K近邻（KNN）和多层感知机（MLP）等算法建模对胁迫类型进行判别,结果显示,MLP模型识别准确率最高（92.3%）。研究提出的分层监测方法能够有效提升茶园多胁迫识别的准确性和效率,为茶园智慧化管理提供了技术支撑,也为其他经济作物胁迫监测提供参考。

关键词: 无人机遥感, 多胁迫监测, 茶园, 茶行提取, 分层策略

Abstract: Tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] is an important economic crop in China. Its production process is highly susceptible to stresses such as pests and diseases, which subsequently lead to a reduction in yield and quality. Accurate monitoring of stress conditions in tea garden is therefore essential for precision and smart management. This study focused on three typical stresses: tea geometrid (Ectropis obliqua), heat stress and anthracnose (Colletotrichum camelliae), and proposed a stepwise multi-stress monitoring method based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing. The research first focused on the characteristics of tea garden ridge-and-furrow structures. By combining a decision tree and edge detection (DT-ED) algorithm, which utilizes the RedEdge band, high-precision extraction of tea rows was achieved. Subsequently, considering the spatial distribution differences of stress within tea garden plots, a plot type discrimination model was constructed based on the coefficient of variation (CV) of the plot's spectrum and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). This model successfully categorized plots into entirely healthy plot (EHTP), entirely stressed plot (ESTP), and partially stressed plot (PSTP), achieving an overall accuracy of 94.7%. Based on this classification, a differentiated strategy was applied: UAV five-point sampling was used for stress assessment and health validation in ESTP and EHTP plots, while a two-step approach of “abnormal zone detection-stress type identification” was applied to PSTP plots. The abnormal zones were delineated using two-stage clustering strategy. Stress type classification was then carried out using algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). The results show that the MLP achieved the best performance, with an overall accuracy of 92.3%. The findings demonstrate that the proposed multi-step monitoring method can effectively improve the accuracy and efficiency of multi-stress identification in tea garden, providing technical support for smart tea garden management and offering a methodological reference for other economic crops.

Key words: UAV remote sensing, multi-stress monitoring, tea garden, tea row extraction, multi-step strategy

中图分类号:

余盈潭, 袁琳, 聂臣巍, 金子晶, 陈冬梅, 李征珍, 李鑫. 基于无人机遥感的茶园多胁迫分层监测方法研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2026, 46(2): 292-310. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.010.

YU Yingtan, YUAN Lin, NIE Chenwei, JIN Zijing, CHEN Dongmei, LI Zhengzhen, LI Xin. A Multi-step Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Approach for Monitoring Stresses in Tea Garden[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2026, 46(2): 292-310. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2026.02.010.

参考文献

[1] 杨芳, 江冰冰, 雷金梅, 等. 茶树叶斑病病原菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(2): 266-272.
Yang F, Jiang B B, Lei J M, et al.Isolation and identification of the pathogen causing leaf spot in tea plants[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2025, 45(2): 266-272.
[2] Mao Y L, Li H, Wang Y, et al.Rapid monitoring of tea plants under cold stress based on UAV multi-sensor data[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023, 213: 108176. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108176.
[3] Zhang J C, Huang Y B, Pu R L, et al.Monitoring plant diseases and pests through remote sensing technology: a review[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 165: 104943. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.104943.
[4] Lu Y Z, Hu Y G, Snyder R L, et al.Tea leaf’s microstructure and ultrastructure response to low temperature in indicating critical damage temperature[J]. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2019, 6(2): 247-254.
[5] Gao J M, Ding M L, Sun Q Y, et al.Classification of southern corn rust severity based on leaf-level hyperspectral data collected under solar illumination[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(11): 2551. doi: 10.3390/rs14112551.
[6] Su J Y, Liu C J, Coombes M, et al.Wheat yellow rust monitoring by learning from multispectral UAV aerial imagery[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 155: 157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.017.
[7] Wang T Y, Thomasson J A, Yang C H, et al.Automatic classification of cotton root rot disease based on UAV remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(8): 1310. doi: 10.3390/rs12081310.
[8] Chakhvashvili E, Machwitz M, Antala M, et al.Crop stress detection from UAVs: best practices and lessons learned for exploiting sensor synergies[J]. Precision Agriculture, 2024, 25: 2614-2642. doi: 10.1007/s11119-024-10168-3.
[9] Wikantika K, Ghazali M F, Dwivany F M, et al.A study on the distribution pattern of banana blood disease (BBD) and Fusarium Wilt using multispectral aerial photos and a handheld spectrometer in Subang, Indonesia[J]. Diversity, 2023, 15(10): 1046. doi: 10.3390/d15101046.
[10] Yuan L, Zhang J C, Deng Q, et al.Differentiation of wheat diseases and pests based on hyperspectral imaging technology with a few specific bands[J]. Phyton, 2023, 92(2): 611-628.
[11] Chen Y W, Guo T F, Shi X Y, et al.Development of a nitrogen requirement map generation method for potato based on UAV visible light image[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2025, 233: 110181. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2025.110181.
[12] Sun H G, Song X Y, Guo W, et al.Potato late blight severity monitoring based on the relief-mRmR algorithm with dual-drone cooperation[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023, 215: 108438. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108438.
[13] Tian B Q, Yu H L, Zhang S L, et al.Inversion of cotton soil and plant analytical development based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral imagery and mixed pixel decomposition[J]. Agriculture, 2024, 14(9): 1452. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14091452.
[14] Zhang H S, Zhao J L, Huang L S, et al.Development of new indices and use of CARS-Ridge algorithm for wheat fusarium head blight detection using in-situ hyperspectral data[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2024, 237: 13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.11.009.
[15] Guo W, Gong Z, Gao C F, et al.An accurate monitoring method of peanut southern blight using unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing[J]. Precision Agriculture, 2024, 25(4): 1857-1876.
[16] Kan Z Y, Chen B, Yu W W, et al.Risk identification of mangroves facing Spartina alterniflora invasion using data-driven approaches with UAV and machine learning models[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2025, 319: 114613. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2025.114613.
[17] 郑国华. 炭疽病侵染对枇杷叶片H₂O₂含量和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 福建农业大学学报, 2001, 30(3): 353-356.
Zheng G H.Effect of anthracnose infection on the content of H₂O₂ and chlorophllous fluorescence in loquat leaves[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2001, 30(3): 353-356.
[18] 韦朝领, 童鑫, 高香凤, 等. 茶树对茶尺蠖取食危害的补偿光合生理反应研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2007(3): 355-359.
Wei C L, Tong X, Gao X F, et al.Compensatory photosynthesis physiology of tea plant for herbivory by Ectropis oblique[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2007(3): 355-359.
[19] 杨菲, 李蓓蓓, 何辰宇. 高温干旱对茶树生长和品质影响机理的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(3): 10-13.
Yang F, Li B B, He C Y.Research progress on the mechanism of high temperature and drought stress effects on tea plant growth and quality[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(3): 10-13.
[20] Berger K, Machwitz M, Kycko M, et al.Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: a review[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2022, 280: 113198. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113198.
[21] Rouse J W, Haas R H, Schell J A, et al.Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS[J]. NASA Special Publication, 1974, 351: 309-317.
[22] Gitelson A A, Viña A, Arkebauer T J, et al.Remote estimation of leaf area index and green leaf biomass in maize canopies[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, 30(5): 1248. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016450.
[23] Rondeaux G, Steven M, Baret F.Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 55(2): 95-107.
[24] El-Shikha D M, Barnes E M, Clarke T R, et al. Remote sensing of cotton nitrogen status using the canopy chlorophyll content index (CCCI)[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2008, 51(1): 73-82.
[25] Patrick A, Pelham S, Culbreath A, et al.High throughput phenotyping of tomato spot wilt disease in peanuts using unmanned aerial systems and multispectral imaging[J]. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 2017, 20(3): 4-12.
[26] Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N, Chivkunova O B.Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves[J]. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2001, 74(1): 38-45.
[27] Roujean J L, Breon F M.Estimating par absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995, 51(3): 375-384.
[28] Jordan C F.Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor[J]. Ecology, 1969, 50(4): 663-666.
[29] Gitelson A A, Kaufman Y J, Merzlyak M N.Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 58(3): 289-298.
[30] Qi J, Chehebouni A, Huete A R, et al.A modified soil adjusted vegetation index[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 48: 119-126.
[31] Chen J M.Evaluation of vegetation indices and a modified simple ratio for boreal applications[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996, 22(3): 229-242.
[32] Jiang Z, Huete A R, Didan K, et al.Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(10): 3833-3845.
[33] Gitelson A A, Kaufman Y J, Stark R, et al.Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 80(1): 76-87.
[34] Gitelson A A.Wide dynamic range vegetation index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161(2): 165-173.
[35] Ortuani B, Mayer A, Bianchi D, et al.Effectiveness of management zones delineated from UAV and Sentinel-2 data for precision viticulture applications[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(4): 635. doi: 10.3390/rs16040635.
[36] Wu W, Zhong X C, Lei C K, et al.Sampling survey method of wheat ear number based on UAV images and density map regression algorithm[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(5): 1280. doi: 10.3390/rs15051280.
[37] Chandra S, Kumar S, Kumar Y.Performance analysis of metaheuristic algorithms for solving data clustering problems[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2025, 259: 80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.309.
[38] Lemenkova P.Support vector machine algorithm for mapping land cover dynamics in Senegal, West Africa, using earth observation data[J]. Earth, 2024, 5(3): 420-462.
[39] Fan X S, Zhang Y, Peng Y, et al.LO-MLPRNN: a classification algorithm for multispectral remote sensing images by fusing selective convolution[J]. Sensors, 2025, 25(8): 2472. doi: 10.3390/s25082472.
[40] Abdullah Salem B T S, Abdullah M N, Mustapha F, et al. Vibration analysis using multi-layer perceptron neural networks for rotor imbalance detection in quadrotor UAV[J]. Drones, 2025, 9(2): 102. doi: 10.3390/drones9020102.
[41] Zhou Q Y, Zhang J C, Wei T W, et al.Prediction of chlorophyll relative content in tea plant canopy using optimize GRNN algorithm and RPA multispectral images[J]. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 2024, 48: e016123. doi: 10.1590/1413-7054202448016123.
[42] Gitelson A A, Viña A, Ciganda V, et al.Remote estimation of canopy chlorophyll content in crops[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(8): L08403. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022688.
[43] Li N W, Huo L N, Zhang X L.Using only the red-edge bands is sufficient to detect tree stress: a case study on the early detection of PWD using hyperspectral drone images[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024, 217: 108665. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108665.
[44] Gitelson A A, Stark R, Grits U, et al.Vegetation and soil lines in visible spectral space: a concept and technique for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002, 23(13): 2537-2562.
[45] Yang H B, Li F, Hu Y C, et al.Hyperspectral indices optimization algorithms for estimating canopy nitrogen concentration in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2021, 102: 102416. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102416.
[46] Henebry G M, Viña A, Gitelson A A. The wide dynamic range vegetation index and its potential utility for gap analysis [J]. Gap Analysis Bulletin, 2004, 12: 50-56. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/262.
[47] Jiang J, Ji H T, Zhou G Z, et al.Non-destructive monitoring of tea plant growth through UAV spectral imagery and meteorological data using machine learning and parameter optimization algorithms[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2025, 229: 109795. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109795.
[48] Xu X H, Yang J H, Zhang Y, et al.Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in tea plantation soil around Tai Lake region in Suzhou, China[J]. Stress Biology, 2024, 4(1): 15. doi: 10.1007/s44154-024-00149-x.
[49] Yuan L, Yan P, Han W Y, et al.Detection of anthracnose in tea plants based on hyperspectral imaging[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 167: 105039. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105039.
[50] 唐美君, 李红, 张欣欣, 等. 温度对灰茶尺蠖幼虫龄期数量的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(1): 79-86.
Tang M J, Li H, Zhang X X, et al.Determination of the larval instar numbers of the Ectropis grisescens at different temperatures[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2025, 45(1): 79-86.
[51] 娄伟平, 肖强, 孙科, 等. 浙江省茶树高温热害风险区划[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 480-486.
Lou W P, Xiao Q, Sun K, et al.Heat stress risk regionalization of tea plant in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(5): 480-486.
[52] Zheng C K, Sun L, Huang H G, et al.Determination of sample fire points by combined medium and high-resolution datasets and its implementation in Himawari-8 to detect fire: deep learning algorithm[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2024: 3514777. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3514777.
[53] Zhao M H, Wang D S, Yan Q, et al.UAV-multispectral based maize lodging stress assessment with machine and deep learning methods[J]. Agriculture, 2024, 15(1): 36. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15010036.
[54] Shi W Q, Li Y H, Zhang W, et al.Monitoring and zoning soybean maturity using UAV remote sensing[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2024, 222: 119470. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119470.
[55] Yuan L, Yu Q M, Zhang Y, et al.Monitoring Thosea sinensis Walker in tea plantations based on UAV multi-spectral image[J]. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 2022, 92(3): 747-761.
[56] Manzoor, Dai Q, Mo Y X, et al. Habitat and density effects on tea quality: a microclimate and nutrients perspective[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2025, 394: 109866. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2025.109866.
[57] Liang D X, Zhou Q Y, Ling C J, et al.Research progress on the application of hyperspectral imaging techniques in tea science[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2023, 37(6): e3481. doi: 10.1002/cem.3481.
[58] Ribes M, Russias G, Tregoat D, et al.Towards low-cost hyperspectral single-pixel imaging for plant phenotyping[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(4): 1132. doi: 10.3390/s20041132.

基于无人机遥感的茶园多胁迫分层监测方法研究

A Multi-step Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Approach for Monitoring Stresses in Tea Garden

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张洁, 胡强, 洪青羽, 江新凤, 吴伟珍, 徐浩, 占洁, 付建玉, 李鑫, 颜鹏, 余继忠, 黄伟红. 间作对茶园生态环境及经济效益的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2026, 46(2): 191-206.
[2]	陈峻锐, 胡钧铭, 石元值, 韦翔华, 宋传奎, 张俊辉, 郑富海, 索广利. 炭基肥对茶园土壤团聚体有机碳物理稳定性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 865-878.
[3]	孟超, 梁涛, 张霞, 王万红, 董煌林, 李明. 基于茶树种植和光伏发电的茶光互补模式研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(5): 898-908.
[4]	孟召娜, FidaHussainMagsi, 赵冬香, 周游, 黎健龙, 农红秋, 龙亚芹, 赵远艳, 黄丽蕴, 边磊, 李兆群, 罗宗秀, 修春丽, 付楠霞, 陈宗懋, 蔡晓明. 我国茶园角盲蝽属种类调查研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(4): 615-624.
[5]	吴梦涛, 李兆群, 杨宇宙, 孟祥飞, 罗宗秀, 边磊, 修春丽, 付楠霞, 陈宗懋, 王国昌, 蔡晓明. 植保无人机作业参数对茶树冠层雾滴沉积分布的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(3): 535-544.
[6]	黄福印, 张少博, 胡强, 罗莹, 董雅洁, 张洁, 李鑫, 付建玉, 王华森, 颜鹏. 森林转化为茶园及其管理对土壤碳、氮库的影响和调控机制初探[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(2): 234-252.
[7]	沈帅, 任宁, 郑航, 俞国红, 陈志东. 茶园履带式掘耕机设计与试验[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(2): 273-283.
[8]	贾治军, 姜嘉胤, 徐家俊, 李杨, 董春旺, 宋文韬, 李凯, 韦持章, 姚雨晨, 姚立健, 杨自栋, 刘皓央, 马蓉. 基于DEM-MBD耦合算法的茶园仿生掘耕机优化与试验[J]. 茶叶科学, 2025, 45(2): 284-302.
[9]	严钰萧, 周大鹏, 杨艳芬, 谢瑾, 吕才有, 杨广容, 文勤枢. 有机种植对茶园土壤微生物群落组成与多样性的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(2): 246-260.
[10]	沈星荣, 汪秋红, 胡强, 王东辉, 傅尚文, 韩文炎, 李鑫. 有机种植方式对茶园土壤酸碱度的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(2): 261-268.
[11]	杨琰琥, 陈潇涵, 张晓晴, 任大军, 张淑琴, 陈旺生. 基于Meta分析的2000—2022年中国茶园土壤重金属污染风险评价与来源分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(1): 37-52.
[12]	韩海东, 周柳婷, 黄小云, 俞成然, 黄秀声. 基于高通量测序技术探究套种灵芝的茶树根际土壤真菌群落结构特征[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(4): 513-524.
[13]	佟岩, 黄荟, 王雨华. 森林茶园古茶树大理茶叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性及系统发育研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(3): 297-309.
[14]	麻万诸, 朱康莹, 卓志清. 酸化对茶园土壤矿物转变及供钾能力的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(1): 17-26.
[15]	姜嘉胤, 董春旺, 倪益华, 徐家俊, 李杨, 马蓉. 基于离散元法的茶园仿生铲减阻性能研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(6): 791-805.