我国茶叶产品质量标准中理化指标差异性分析

doi:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.05.006

茶叶科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 843-852.doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.05.006

我国茶叶产品质量标准中理化指标差异性分析

李文燕^1,4, 张琳^1,2,3, 陈利燕^1,2,3, 张颖彬^1,2,3, 周苏娟^1,2,3, 洪一苇^1,2,3, 梁思辰⁵, 孙洪峰⁵, 陈红平^1,2,3,*

1.中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,浙江杭州 310008;
2.农业农村部茶叶质量安全控制重点实验室,浙江杭州 310008;
3.农业农村部茶叶产品质量安全风险评估实验室（杭州）,浙江杭州 310008;
4.中国农业科学院研究生院,北京 100081;
5.上海康识食品科技有限公司,上海 201100

收稿日期:2024-07-17 修回日期:2024-08-27 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-11-08
通讯作者: *thean27@tricaas.com
作者简介:李文燕,女,硕士研究生,主要从事茶叶加工与质量控制研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2022YFF0606800）、中国农业科学院创新团队项目（CAAS-ASTIP-2016-TRICAAS）、国家现代农业产业技术体系（CARS-19）

Analysis of the Differences in Physical and Chemical Indicators of Tea Product Quality Standards in China

LI Wenyan^1,4, ZHANG Lin^1,2,3, CHEN Liyan^1,2,3, ZHANG Yingbin^1,2,3, ZHOU Sujuan^1,2,3, HONG Yiwei^1,2,3, LIANG Sichen⁵, SUN Hongfeng⁵, CHEN Hongping^1,2,3,*

1. Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310008, China;
3. Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Tea Products (Hangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310008, China;
4. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
5. Shanghai Kangshi Food Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201100, China;

Received:2024-07-17 Revised:2024-08-27 Online:2024-10-15 Published:2024-11-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 理化成分是影响茶叶品质的关键物质,一定程度上决定了茶叶的风味品质特征、质量等级,因而成为我国茶叶产品标准的关键指标。我国茶叶产品种类丰富,相关标准较多,具有一定共性特征与特殊性,但我国茶叶产品标准之间理化指标的关系鲜见报道。收集整理了我国已制定茶及相关产品的国家、行业和地方标准227项,涉及20项理化指标。因产地、原料、加工工艺和采摘标准等不同,各茶叶标准对理化指标的要求存在一定差异性,但质量要求的方向保持一致。绿茶标准的数量及其理化指标参数最多,要求最高,茶叶国家标准的要求普遍低于行业或地方标准。与国家茶叶基础性产品标准相比,地理标志茶叶产品在理化指标的要求上一般较高。本研究为我国茶叶产品质量标准体系构建与完善提供参考。

关键词: 茶叶质量标准, 理化指标, 差异

Abstract: Physical and chemical components, as the key substance of tea quality, to a certain extent determine the flavor, quality characteristics, and quality level of tea, thus becoming the key indicator of Chinese tea product standards. China has set up a variety of standards related to tea products, which have certain common characteristics and specificities. However, at present, there is little research on the physical and chemical indicator characteristics of Chinese tea product standards. We collected 227 national, industry, and local standards for tea and related products in China, including 20 physical and chemical indicators. Due to differences in origin, raw materials, processing technology and harvesting time, there is some variability in the requirements of physical and chemical indicators among different tea standards, but the direction of quality requirements is consistent. The number of green tea standards, as well as their physical and chemical index parameters are the most numerous and most demanding. The requirements of national standards for tea are generally lower than those of industry or local standards. Compared with national basic tea product standards, geographical indications for tea products are generally higher in terms of physical and chemical index requirements. This study provided a reference for the construction and improvement of the product quality standard system of tea products in China.

Key words: tea quality standard, physical and chemical indicators, difference

中图分类号:

S571.1

李文燕, 张琳, 陈利燕, 张颖彬, 周苏娟, 洪一苇, 梁思辰, 孙洪峰, 陈红平. 我国茶叶产品质量标准中理化指标差异性分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(5): 843-852. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.05.006.

LI Wenyan, ZHANG Lin, CHEN Liyan, ZHANG Yingbin, ZHOU Sujuan, HONG Yiwei, LIANG Sichen, SUN Hongfeng, CHEN Hongping. Analysis of the Differences in Physical and Chemical Indicators of Tea Product Quality Standards in China[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2024, 44(5): 843-852. doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2024.05.006.

参考文献

[1] 梅宇, 梁晓. 2023年我国茶叶产销及进出口形势分析[J]. 中国茶叶, 2024, 46(4): 18-26.
Mei Y, Liang X.Analysis of China's tea production, sales, import and export situation in 2023[J]. China Tea, 2024, 46(4): 18-26.
[2] Wang X C, Feng H, Chang Y X, et al.Population sequencing enhances understanding of tea plant evolution[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 4447. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18228-8.
[3] Fu Z P, Chen L Y, Zhou S J, et al.Analysis of differences in the accumulation of tea compounds under various processing techniques, geographical origins, and harvesting seasons[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 430: 137000. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137000.
[4] 毛雅琳, 汪芳, 尹军峰, 等. 不同茶树品种碾茶的品质分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(6): 782-794.
Mao Y L, Wang F, Yin J F, et al.Quality analysis of tencha made from different tea cultivars[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(6): 782-794.
[5] Tong M N, Chen X, Bai Y, et al.Quality characteristics of white leaf tea of ‘Baiye 1' ( Camellia sinensis ) in different producing areas[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(10): 2526. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13102526.
[6] 徐邢燕, 陈思, 俞晓敏, 等. 不同烘焙程度与等级武夷肉桂茶品质差异分析[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(13): 22-28.
Xu X Y, Chen S, Yu X M, et al.Quality differences of different grades of Wuyi Rougui tea with different baking degrees[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(13): 22-28.
[7] 陈倩莲, 王芳, 陈百文, 等. 环境湿度对大红袍做青品质的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(2): 593-598.
Chen Q L, Wang F, Chen B W, et al.Effects of environmental humidity on the quality of Dahongpao during Zuoqing process[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2022, 13(2): 593-598.
[8] 李荣林, 艾仄宜, 穆兵, 等. 不同干燥成形方式的白叶红茶品质分析[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(19): 6230-6237.
Li R L, Ai Z Y, Mu B, et al.Quality analysis on black tea made from albinos tea leaves under different drying-shaping ways[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2022, 13(19): 6230-6237.
[9] 熊利华. 近红外光谱法快速检测茶叶中粗纤维、水分和灰分的研究[D]. 上海: 东华理工大学, 2018: 1-2.
Xiong L H.The study on rapid determination of crude fiber, moisture and ash in tea by near infrared spectroscopy [D]. Shanghai: East China University of Technology, 2018: 1-2.
[10] 陈红平, 刘新, 鲁成银, 等. 茶叶内含物质与外源污染物在冲泡过程中的浸出规律[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(1): 63-76.
Chen H P, Liu X, Lu C Y, et al.Leaching pattern of internal substances and xenobiotic pollutants during tea brewing[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2020, 40(1): 63-76.
[11] Liu S, Wang B, Lin L, et al.L-Theanine alleviates heat stress through modulation of gut microbiota and immunity[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2024, 104(4): 2059-2072.
[12] 叶秋萍, 余雯, 郑世仲, 等. 茉莉花茶窨制过程水分变化与香气品质变化的相关性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(24): 266-272.
Ye Q P, Yu W, Zheng S Z, et al.Correlation analysis of moisture content and aroma quality in the scenting process of jasmine tea[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(24): 266-272.
[13] 梅宇, 张朔. 2022年中国茶叶生产与内销形势分析[J]. 中国茶叶, 2023, 45(4): 25-30.
Mei Y, Zhang S.Analysis of China's tea production and domestic sales in 2022[J]. China Tea, 2023, 45(4): 25-30.
[14] 梅宇, 梁晓. 2018年中国茉莉花茶产销形势通报[J]. 中国茶叶加工, 2019(4): 21-25.
Mei Y, Zhang S. Chinese Jasmine Tea Production and Marketing Situation Report in2018 [J]. China Tea Processing, 2019(4): 21-25.
[15] 郭建军, 周艺, 王小英, 等. 贵州不同产区代表绿茶的品质特征及香气组分分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(5): 78-84, 92.
Guo J J, Zhou Y, Wang X Y, et al.Analysis of quality features and aroma components in Guizhou representative green tea[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(5): 78-84, 92.
[16] 张悦, 朱荫, 吕海鹏, 等. 不同海拔烘青绿茶的品质成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(2): 257-268.
Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lü H P, et al.Comparative analysis of quality components in baked green tea made from tea plants grown at different altitudes[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(2): 257-268.
[17] 刘盼盼, 郑鹏程, 龚自明, 等. 青砖茶渥堆工艺优化及风味物质分析[J]. 中国食品学报, 2021, 21(8): 224-234.
Liu P P, Zheng P C, Gong Z M, et al.Pile-fermentation process optimization and flavor components analysis Qingzhuan tea[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 21(8): 224-234.
[18] 刘晓慧, 王琼, 邓锶涵, 等. 不同等级软枝乌龙茶品质研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 37(3): 464-470.
Liu X H, Wang Q, Deng S H, et al.Study on the Ruanzhi oolong tea quality differences of different grades[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2022, 37(3): 464-470.
[19] 亓峥, 庞志强, 卢炜丽, 等. 云南不同茶树品种(系)叶性状及变异性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(7): 36-44.
Qi Z, Pang Z Q, Lu W L, et al.Leaf traits of different tea varieties (lines) in Yunnan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(7): 36-44.
[20] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 地理标志产品保护规定[EB/OL]. (2005-07-15) [2024-03-17] https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/bgt/art/2023/art_830512d8ecbf4225ae73f697dfc19457.html.
General Administration of Quality Supervision. Provisions on the protection of geographical indication products [EB/OL]. (2005-07-15) [2024-03-17] https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/bgt/art/2023/art_830512d8ecbf4225ae73f697dfc19457.html.
[21] Wu G H, Gu W, Cheng H J, et al.Huangshan Maofeng green tea extracts prevent obesity-associated metabolic disorders by maintaining homeostasis of gut microbiota and hepatic lipid classes in leptin receptor Knockout rats[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(19): 2939. doi: 10.3390/foods11192939.
[22] Wang T, Li R Y, Liu K Y, et al.Changes in sensory characteristics, chemical composition and microbial succession during fermentation of ancient plants Pu-erh tea[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2023, 20: 101003. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.101003.

我国茶叶产品质量标准中理化指标差异性分析

Analysis of the Differences in Physical and Chemical Indicators of Tea Product Quality Standards in China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王冬雪, 满佳旭, 武思敏, 赵雪婷, 张冬英. 云南十里香茶树空间转录组测序研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(3): 399-410.
[2]	霍增辉, 柳畅, 张玫, 陈富桥, 刘仲华. 农药最大残留限量标准差异对我国茶叶出口RCEP成员国的贸易效率影响研究——基于随机前沿引力模型[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(3): 526-542.
[3]	陈德权, 任杨梅, 何梦迪, 李尤学, 叶利利, 薛华倩, 曾建明, 丁长庆. 基于感官评价和代谢组学技术解析紫阳绿茶风味特征和生化成分差异[J]. 茶叶科学, 2024, 44(2): 316-328.
[4]	杨军, 张力岚, 张雯婧, 陈林海, 郑国华, 李毅晶, 王让剑. 福建茶树种质资源群体结构及遗传差异[J]. 茶叶科学, 2023, 43(6): 769-783.
[5]	王涛, 王艺清, 漆思雨, 周喆, 陈志丹, 孙威江. 茶树CLH基因家族的鉴定与转录调控研究及其在白化茶树中的表达分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42(3): 331-346.
[6]	刘霞, 李芳, 宋勤飞, 牛素贞, 吕立堂. 大厂茶紫芽品系P113不同季节花青素调控相关基因表达分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(6): 789-801.
[7]	林家正, 涂政, 陈琳, 叶阳, 刘飞, 王玉婉, 杨云飞, 伍洵, 吕昊威. 红光萎凋对茶叶挥发性成分及其成品红茶品质的影响[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(3): 393-405.
[8]	吕海涛, 吴文君, 廖声熙, 王子芝, 周俊宏, 李立, 崔凯. 三类云南普洱茶树的地基光谱反射特征及其差异分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2021, 41(2): 184-192.
[9]	魏日凤, 赖建东, 彭成彬, 张承康, 连玲丽, 刘伟. 利用cDNA-AFLP技术分析炭疽菌危害诱导茶树的差异表达基因[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(1): 26-38.
[10]	孙云南, 许燕, 冉隆珣, 蒋会兵, 宋维希, 夏丽飞, 陈林波, 梁名志. 茶树叶片响应茶饼病侵染的转录组分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(1): 113-124.
[11]	黄丹娟, 谭荣荣, 陈勋, 王红娟, 龚自明, 王友平, 毛迎新. 铝诱导的茶树根系转录组变化分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(5): 506-520.
[12]	王君雅, 陈玮, 刘丁丁, 陈亮, 姚明哲, 马春雷. 不同品种茶树新梢响应“倒春寒”的转录组分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(2): 181-192.
[13]	向奕, 刘硕谦, 龚志华, 陈栋, 肖文军. 茶树紫芽中花青素形成相关基因差异表达分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 439-449.
[14]	王梦琪, 邵晨阳, 朱荫, 张悦, 林智, 吕海鹏. 龙井茶香气成分的产区差异分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(5): 508-517.
[15]	蒋会兵, 孙云南, 李梅, 戴伟东, 宋维希, 田易萍, 夏丽飞, 陈林波. 紫娟茶树叶片不同发育期花青素积累及合成相关基因的表达[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(2): 174-182.